henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivEcologyPreprint

Behavioral metabolic suppression confounds thermal performance estimates and climate vulnerability assessments in a marine ectotherm

Cameron Edgar, Henry Penfold, Tanya Martinez, Christopher D. WellsiD

PDFDOICodeData

Abstract

O_LIThermal performance curves (TPCs) predict species vulnerability to climate change, but standard respirometry assumes that measured oxygen consumption reflects physiological state. Sessile invertebrates that retract their tentacles and contract under thermal stress violate this assumption, with unmeasured consequences for thermal limit estimates. C_LIO_LIWe tested this behavioral confound in an undescribed cold-water intertidal anemone (Urticina sp.) in the Northwest Atlantic by integrating a negative binomial encounter-rate regression, a maximum entropy species distribution model (both from effort-corrected iNaturalist data), and closed-chamber respirometry across seven temperatures (1-30{degrees}C). C_LIO_LIThe strongest distributional predictors were cloud cover and coastal urbanization, with a weaker association with winter minimum SST; direct evidence for warm-edge thermal limitation came from the experiment. Anemone expansion state was variable and without a clear trend across the coldest treatments, declining above 20{degrees}C, and collapsing at the 30{degrees}C treatment, which proved lethal. C_LIO_LIStandard TPC models extrapolated the thermal maximum far beyond the lethal bracket. A Bayesian multiplicative model that separated physiology from behavior showed that physiology continued to track temperature while expansion state declined above 20{degrees}C; a fully expanded anemone respired about twice as fast as a fully closed one at the same temperature. The decline in measured respiration is therefore both behavioral and physiological, and disentangling the two requires recording expansion state alongside oxygen consumption. C_LIO_LIBecause a closed anemone cannot feed or exchange gases, the ecologically relevant thermal limit is the temperature at which the animal can no longer maintain its normal expanded posture, not a curve-fitted thermal maximum. That behavioral threshold leaves warm-edge populations within a few degrees of functional thermal failure. C_LIO_LIFuture thermal physiology studies of organisms capable of modulating oxygen consumption through behavior should incorporate quantitative behavioral covariates to separate physiological from behavioral components of the metabolic response. C_LI ResumeO_LILes courbes de performance thermique (CPT) predisent la vulnerabilite des especes au changement climatique, mais la respirometrie classique postule que la consommation doxygene mesuree reflete letat physiologique. Les invertebres sessiles qui retractent leurs tentacules et se contractent sous stress thermique ne satisfont pas cette hypothese, avec des consequences non quantifiees sur lestimation des limites thermiques. C_LIO_LINous avons teste ce facteur de confusion comportemental chez une anemone intertidale deau froide non decrite (Urticina sp.) de lAtlantique Nord-Ouest, en combinant une regression binomiale negative du taux de rencontre, un modele de distribution despeces a maximum dentropie (tous deux sur donnees iNaturalist corrigees de leffort) et une respirometrie en chambre close a sept temperatures (1 a 30 {degrees}C). C_LIO_LILes principaux predicteurs etaient la couverture nuageuse et lurbanisation cotiere, lassociation au minimum hivernal de temperature de surface de la mer etant plus faible. La preuve directe dune limitation thermique en bordure chaude provient de lexperience. Letat dexpansion variait sans tendance nette aux traitements les plus froids, diminuait au-dela de 20 {degrees}C et seffondrait a 30 {degrees}C, traitement qui sest revele letal. C_LIO_LILes CPT classiques ont extrapole le maximum thermique bien au-dela de lintervalle letal. Un modele bayesien multiplicatif separant physiologie et comportement a montre que la physiologie suivait toujours la temperature alors que letat dexpansion diminuait au-dela de 20 {degrees}C; a temperature egale, une anemone pleinement epanouie respirait environ deux fois plus quune anemone pleinement fermee. La baisse mesuree est donc a la fois comportementale et physiologique, et les dissocier exige denregistrer letat dexpansion avec la consommation doxygene. C_LIO_LIUne anemone fermee ne pouvant ni se nourrir ni assurer ses echanges gazeux, la limite thermique ecologiquement pertinente est la temperature a laquelle lanimal ne peut plus maintenir son expansion normale, et non un maximum issu dun ajustement de courbe. Ce seuil comportemental place les populations de bordure chaude a quelques degres de la defaillance thermique fonctionnelle. C_LIO_LILes futures etudes de physiologie thermique sur des organismes capables de moduler leur consommation doxygene par leur comportement devraient integrer des covariables comportementales quantitatives pour separer les composantes physiologique et comportementale de la reponse metabolique. C_LI

In-depth summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 8 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 2 (18 Aug 2026) · CC BY 4.0

In an undescribed intertidal Urticina anemone, heat-induced closure suppresses measured respiration, and fitted thermal performance curves place the critical thermal maximum far above the 25-30°C lethal range.

Thermal safety margins used in climate vulnerability assessments rely on respirometry-derived thermal performance curves, yet sessile invertebrates that contract under heat stress suppress oxygen uptake behaviorally, a confound that had not been partitioned within a single trial. The work quantifies this confound and proposes a one-parameter multiplicative model that scales a recorded expansion-state covariate to separate behavioral from physiological responses.

Key results

  1. ShownCurve-fitted critical thermal maxima (CTmax) far exceed the empirical lethal limit: every animal died at 30°C, yet the best asymmetric model and a symmetric Gaussian fit both extrapolated CTmax well above it.

    All 18 individuals died at 30°C (lethal limit between 25 and 30°C); Sharpe-Schoolfield multiplicative CTmax 45.9°C (95% CI: 35.3-65.4) vs 74.2°C for the symmetric Gaussian multiplicative fit; the authors note 45.9°C is nearly 16°C above the temperature at which animals died. · Thermal performance experiment; Discussion

  2. ShownExpansion state fell above 20°C while oxygen uptake peaked at 25°C. A multiplicative Bayesian model estimates that a fully expanded anemone respires nearly twice as much as a fully closed one at the same temperature.

    Mean expansion 0.26-0.51 from 1 to 20°C, 0.26 at 25°C, 0.05 at 30°C; oxygen uptake 125 (1°C) to 335 (25°C) then 236 µg O2 g^-1 h^-1 (30°C). Multiplier s = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.63-1.30), i.e. 1.94-fold; about 1.4-fold across observed expansion (0.05 to 0.51); s = 0.82 (95% CI 0.57-1.10) excluding 30°C. · Thermal performance experiment; Discussion

  3. ShownAdding expansion state improved fit for every curve shape. The best model (Sharpe-Schoolfield with high-temperature inactivation, multiplicative behavior) placed the thermal optimum just inside the lethal bracket.

    All 12 candidate models converged; smallest ΔLOOIC over naïve was 16.8 (SE = 5.3) (Briere2 naïve vs multiplicative); best model Topt 26.5°C (95% CI: 24.7-28.1), peak rate 349 µg O2 g^-1 h^-1 (95% CI: 311-394); Briere2 alone favored additive over multiplicative (ΔLOOIC = 46.7); log dry mass improved fit (ΔLOOIC = 6, SE = 2.4) without changing parameters. · Thermal performance experiment

  4. SuggestedEffort-corrected iNaturalist encounter rate rose with cloud cover and fell with developed coastline, with a weaker positive link to winter minimum sea surface temperature (SST). MaxEnt suitability tracked the regression surface.

    Present in 41 of 672 cells; cloud cover IRR = 5.49 per SD (95% CI: 1.97-15.28; p = 0.001), developed coastline IRR = 0.51 (95% CI: 0.34-0.77; p = 0.002), winter minimum SST IRR = 2.70 (95% CI: 1.06-6.90; p = 0.038); MaxEnt validation AUC = 0.861 ± 0.073; NB vs MaxEnt Spearman ρ = 0.82. · Encounter rate regression; Species distribution model

  5. SuggestedMeasured against summer SST at the warmest occupied site, the behavioral safety margin is narrow. The authors argue it probably overstates real thermal headroom, because the assays were acute and exposure was based on SST.

    Warmest summer sea surface temperature at the warmest occupied site 20.9°C; behavioral safety margin roughly 4 to 9°C relative to the 25-30°C bracket where sustained closure sets in; experimental Topt 26.5°C. · Discussion

Methods, data and reproducibility

Effort-corrected iNaturalist records on an H3 hexagonal grid fed a negative binomial encounter-rate regression and a spatially cross-validated maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model; 18 anemones had closed-chamber respirometry at seven temperatures with expansion scoring, analyzed by Bayesian nonlinear mixed models (four curve shapes by three behavioral structures).

  • Photo-vouchered iNaturalist records of the undescribed Urticina sp., Northwest Atlantic coast (41.5-51°N, 71-52°W), retrieved 12 July 2026 from all Actiniaria observations · Urticina sp. (undescribed intertidal sea anemone) · n = 357 records; present in 41 of 672 regression cells
  • iNaturalist counts of non-target intertidal taxa (echinoderms, crustaceans, caenogastropods, barnacles, red, green and brown algae) per H3 cell as an effort proxy · multiple marine invertebrate and algal taxa
  • Marine, atmospheric, terrestrial climate, coastal development and protected-area rasters averaged per H3 cell; variance inflation factor screening at 5.0 · n = 16 candidate predictors
  • MaxEnt training set: spatially thinned presence cells plus effort-weighted background draws from coastal cells with environmental data · Urticina sp. (undescribed intertidal sea anemone) · n = 41 presence cells; 5000 background draws from 848 cells
  • Mid-intertidal Urticina sp. collected at West Quoddy Head, Lubec, Maine, for closed-chamber respirometry at seven temperatures (1 to 30°C) with expansion scoring · Urticina sp. (undescribed intertidal sea anemone) · n = 18 individuals; 126 trials · 10.5281/zenodo.21346544 (Zenodo, data and analysis code)
Methods & tools
glmmTMB 1.1.10 (negative binomial regression), DHARMa 0.4.7 (residual diagnostics), maxnet 0.1.4 (MaxEnt), ENMeval 2.0.5.2 (model tuning), blockCV 3.2.0 (spatial block cross-validation), brms 2.22.0 (Bayesian nonlinear mixed models), loo 2.8.0 (LOOIC model comparison), rnaturalearth 1.2.0 (1:10m coastline), H3 hexagonal grid (resolution 5), Strathkelvin Instruments Model 872 oxygen meter, YSI ProDSS, Sharpe-Schoolfield, Briere2, Gaussian and quadratic TPC models
Software & environment
R 4.6.0 with glmmTMB 1.1.10, DHARMa 0.4.7, maxnet 0.1.4, ENMeval 2.0.5.2, blockCV 3.2.0, brms 2.22.0, loo 2.8.0, rnaturalearth 1.2.0; brms run with four chains of 4000 iterations (2000 warmup).
Reproducibility gaps
Predictor sources, priors and convergence details are in supplementary tables (S1, S3, S4) not included in the text; no container or package lockfile is described.
Limitations (6)
  • The best model's curve-fitted CTmax (45.9°C) is sensitive to the priors for high-temperature inactivation and sits far outside the measured range, so the authors adopt the observed 25-30°C lethal bracket as their warm-limit metric. · stated by the authors
  • The 1.94-fold respiration contrast compares modeled fully expanded and fully closed states that were never observed; across the observed expansion range (0.05 to 0.51) the difference was only about 1.4-fold. · stated by the authors
  • The thermal optimum is informed by the single lethal 30°C treatment and is conditional on it, and the multiplicative model assumes metabolic rate scales linearly with expansion state. · stated by the authors
  • Encounter-rate and MaxEnt models reuse the same occurrence records and screened predictors, so their agreement (Spearman ρ = 0.82) is a consistency check, not independent corroboration; developed coastline is confounded with summer temperature near the warm edge. · stated by the authors
  • The 4 to 9°C behavioral safety margin is probably generous, since chronic tolerance, heatwave pre-exposure and aerial emersion body temperatures were not assessed; whether the confound scales across sessile taxa is untested. · stated by the authors
  • Temperatures were given in fixed ascending order to the same 18 animals (at least 48 h apart), confounding temperature with time in captivity and cumulative handling; one observer scored expansion in 0.2 steps with no reported reliability check. · noted in this summary

Read this if you estimate thermal limits or safety margins from respirometry in sessile or behaviorally plastic ectotherms and want a one-parameter way to separate behavioral suppression from physiology.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.