PLoS Computational BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
An inductive bias for slowly changing features in human reinforcement learning
Noa L. HedrichiD, Eric SchulziD, Sam Hall-McMasteriD, Nicolas W. SchuckiD
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Abstract
Identifying goal-relevant features in novel environments is a central challenge for efficient behaviour. We asked whether humans address this challenge by relying on prior knowledge about common properties of reward-predicting features. One such property is the rate of change of features, given that behaviourally relevant processes tend to change on a slower timescale than noise. Hence, we asked whether humans are biased to learn more when task-relevant features are slow rather than fast. To test this idea, 295 human participants were asked to learn the rewards of two-dimensional bandits when either a slowly or quickly changing feature of the bandit predicted reward. Across two experiments and one preregistered replication, participants accrued more reward when a bandits relevant feature changed slowly, and its irrelevant feature quickly, as compared to the opposite. We did not find a difference in the ability to generalise to unseen feature values between conditions. Testing how feature speed could affect learning with a set of four function approximation Kalman filter models revealed that participants had a higher learning rate for the slow feature, and adjusted their learning to both the relevance and the speed of feature changes. The larger the improvement in participants performance for slow compared to fast bandits, the more strongly they adjusted their learning rates. These results provide evidence that human reinforcement learning favours slower features, suggesting a bias in how humans approach reward learning. Author summaryLearning experiments in the laboratory are often assumed to exist in a vacuum, where participants solve a given task independently of how they learn in more natural circumstances. But humans and other animals are in fact well known to "meta learn", i.e. to leverage generalisable assumptions about how to learn from other experiences. Taking inspiration from a well-known machine learning technique known as slow feature analysis, we investigated one specific instance of such an assumption in learning: the possibility that humans tend to focus on slowly rather than quickly changing features when learning about rewards. To test this, we developed a task where participants had to learn the value of stimuli composed of two features. Participants indeed learned better from a slowly rather than quickly changing feature that predicted reward. Computational modelling of participant behaviour indicated that participants had a higher learning rate for slowly changing features from the outset. Hence, our results support the idea that human reinforcement learning reflects a priori assumptions about the reward structure in natural environments.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Contribution of statistical learning to learning from reward feedback
Aryan Yazdanpanah, Michael Chong Wang, … Alireza Soltani·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2024
- Your favorite color makes learning more precise and adaptable
Shiva Ghaani Farashahi, Katherine Rowe, … Alireza Soltani·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2017
- Plucking a string or playing a G? Choice type impacts human reinforcement learning
M. Rmus, A. R. Zou, A. G. E. Collins·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2021
- Learning at variable attentional load requires cooperation between working memory, meta-learning and attention-augmented reinforcement learning
T. Womelsdorf, M. R. Watson, P. Tiesinga·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2020
- Confirmation bias optimizes reward learning
T. Tarantola, T. Folke, … B. De Martino·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2021
- The influence of movement speed on reward-based motor learning
Nina Marieke van Mastrigt, Katinka van der Kooij, Jeroen B. J. Smeets·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2023