bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
Microplate micromilling: A customizable platform to support the prototyping, development and testing of microphysiological culture models
Jacob I. ReynoldsiD, Meredith Adams, Jose Jimenez, Brian P. JohnsoniD
Abstract
The development of microphysiological cell culture models (MPMs) that align with the throughput demands of drug and chemical testing are needed to help reduce animal testing, aide in the discovery of new drugs, and identify harmful chemical exposures. To address this need, we have developed a process for rapid prototyping MPM devices using computer numerical control (CNC) micromilling of commercially available microplates. Microchannels are cut out of the existing microplate structure and ports are drilled into the bottom of the wells to interface the wells. To test versatility and benchmark to another rapid-prototyping approach, we manufactured common microfluidic features into microplates using four different CNC mills as well as a 3D printer. Cell viability was assessed for polystyrene (PS) well plates and two 3D printed resins (MED610 and VeroClear) with the PS showing >2.5-fold increase in cell growth after three days. Machines were tested on their ability to create common device features including a traditional microfluidic device as well as a custom design incorporating complex geometries. Features were measured by confocal microscopy. We found that features including 1000{micro}m ports, 800{micro}m microchannels, 200{micro}m phase-guides, and 500{micro}m post arrays were machined and the range of CVs for features were 1.02-4.42, 1.32-3.50, 2.34-16.58, 6.25-16.40 respectively, while the 3D printed features exhibited maximal CVs of 20.98, 11.68, 23.60, and 10.01 for the same features. Predictably, more expensive machines generally showed higher accuracy and lower variation, but many features could be created accurately and precisely by inexpensive ( View larger version (42K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1be08eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@33b0a4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192167borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@200b7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- 5-axis CNC micro-milling machine for three-dimensional microfluidics
Mitchell Modarelli, Devin M. Kot-Thompson, Kazunori Hoshino·Lab on a ChipPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2024
- Multipath projection stereolithography (MPS) for 3D printing microfluidic devices
Zachary J. Geffert, Zheng Xiong, … Pranav Soman·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2024
- Agile manufacturing of PDMS microfluidic devices for cell culture without a clean room
Jean-Abel Merino, Cristian Angeli, Juan Manuel Garcia-Arcos·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2026
- SOL3D: Soft-lithography on 3D vat polymerised moulds for fast, versatile, and accessible high-resolution fabrication of customised multiscale cell culture devices with complex designs
C. Hagemann, M. C. D. Bailey, … A. Serio·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2022
- Fundamentals of rapid injection molding for microfluidic cell-based assays
U. N. Lee, X. Su, … A. B. Theberge·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2017
- Experimental Validation of an Organ-on-Chip for Mechanical Stimulation of Cell Cultures
M. Testa, S. Tornabene, … F. Lopresti·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2023