Generalized neural decoders for transfer learning across participants and recording modalities
Steven M. PetersoniD, Zoe Steine-HansoniD, Nathan Davis, Rajesh P. N. RaoiD, Bingni W. BruntoniD
Abstract
ObjectiveAdvances in neural decoding have enabled brain-computer interfaces to perform increasingly complex and clinically-relevant tasks. However, such decoders are often tailored to specific participants, days, and recording sites, limiting their practical long-term usage. Therefore, a fundamental challenge is to develop neural decoders that can robustly train on pooled, multi-participant data and generalize to new participants. ApproachWe introduce a new decoder, HTNet, which uses a convolutional neural network with two innovations: (1) a Hilbert transform that computes spectral power at data-driven frequencies and (2) a layer that projects electrode-level data onto predefined brain regions. The projection layer critically enables applications with intracranial electrocorticography (ECoG), where electrode locations are not standardized and vary widely across participants. We trained HTNet to decode arm movements using pooled ECoG data from 11 of 12 participants and tested performance on unseen ECoG or electroencephalography (EEG) participants; these pretrained models were also subsequently fine-tuned to each test participant. Main resultsHTNet outperformed state-of-the-art decoders when tested on unseen participants, even when a different recording modality was used. By fine-tuning these generalized HTNet decoders, we achieved performance approaching the best tailored decoders with as few as 50 ECoG or 20 EEG events. We were also able to interpret HTNets trained weights and demonstrate its ability to extract physiologically-relevant features. SignificanceBy generalizing to new participants and recording modalities, robustly handling variations in electrode placement, and allowing participant-specific fine-tuning with minimal data, HTNet is applicable across a broader range of neural decoding applications compared to current state-of-the-art decoders.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 40
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Subject-Agnostic Transformer-Based Neural Speech Decoding from Surface and Depth Electrode Signals
Junbo Chen, Xupeng Chen, … Yao Wang·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2024
- Learning neural decoders without labels using multiple data streams
Steven M. Peterson, Rajesh P. N. Rao, Bingni W. Brunton·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2022
- Continuous Tracking using Deep Learning-based Decoding for Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface
D. Forenzo, H. Zhu, … B. He·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2023
- Sequence Transfer Learning for Neural Decoding
Venkatesh Elango, Aashish N. Patel, … Vikash Gilja·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2017
- A Neural Speech Decoding Framework Leveraging Deep Learning and Speech Synthesis
Xupeng Chen, Ran Wang, … Adeen Flinker·Nature Machine IntelligencePeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2024
- Benchmarking Neural Decoders for Brain-Computer Interfaces and Neural Population Analysis
Joseph Soo, Kam Pang So, Xin Tang·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2026