Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionJournal of Ethology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Cockroach social network position does not influence exploration tendency

Vasilis LoucaiD, Smilla Savorelli, Nea Vuorio, David N. FisheriD

Abstract

In group-living organisms, we might expect relationships between social position and exploration, such as if certain patterns of social associations encourage exploration or if certain personality types both link different groups and are more likely to explore their environment. However, directly testing these ideas is challenging as exploration can be hard to track in the field and is a difficult trait to measure in the laboratory. Furthermore, invertebrate exploration is less commonly quantified as their small size makes them hard to track. Here we quantified social networks in multiple groups of the gregarious cockroach Blaptica dubia in the laboratory and related three measures of social network position (representing overall sociability, connectedness in local cliques, and connectedness to the wider network) to measures of exploration either assayed alone or as part of a group. We found none of the social network measures related to either of the measures of exploration, which were themselves not correlated. We also found that sociability and connectedness to the wider network were positively correlated, suggesting a single axis of variation in centrality within a group. We found no effects of mass or sex, but there were differences between the two blocks our experiments were performed in, suggesting some effect of observer variability. Overall, our results suggest that exploration is not linked to social behaviour in this species, that cockroaches differ in the social behaviour along a syndrome integrating sociability and the tendency to move between groups, and that study replication should be encouraged so we can be confident identified trends are robust.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
2
FWCI
1.85
Field percentile
top 21%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.