Comparable phosphene size and contrast properties, but differing detection reliability for optogenetic versus electrical stimulation of macaque V1
Kumari Liza, Marta Falkowska-Kisiel, Jaime Cadena-ValenciaiD, Jennifer GreilsameriD, Florian Lanz, Marcus HaagiD, Alessandra BergadanoiD, Diego GhezziiD, Michael C. SchmidiD
Abstract
Cortical visual prostheses aim to restore vision by stimulating primary visual cortex (V1) to evoke artificial percepts (phosphenes). Electrical stimulation has long served this purpose, and optogenetic approaches promise higher spatial resolution via cell-type specificity. Recent investigations have demonstrated localized behavioral responses to optogenetic V1 stimulation (1--3), but the applied perimetry paradigms cannot dissociate a genuine percept from a reflexive oculomotor response, leaving the perceptual character of optogenetic phosphenes unresolved. To address this gap, two macaques received optogenetic V1 injections guided by laminar electrophysiology and performed detection and discrimination tasks under interleaved electrical, optogenetic, and visual stimulation, enabling direct within-subject comparison. Electrical stimulation reliably evoked detectable percepts (positive d' in 100% of sessions), with thresholds scaling with current, resembling visual contrast-response functions. Optogenetic stimulation was far less reliable, with positive d' in only ~50% of sessions, despite confirmed V1 activation. Despite this reliability difference, optogenetically evoked percepts closely resembled electrically and visually evoked percepts in perceptual character: perceived size (~1{degrees} of visual angle) was comparable across conditions and scaled similarly with eccentricity. Similarly, perceived contrast equivalents (5%-11% visual-contrast equivalent) were broadly comparable across stimulation approaches. These findings indicate that successful optogenetic activation engages the same perceptual encoding mechanisms as electrical and natural vision, but that reliable detection may additionally depend on circuit-level mechanisms not consistently engaged by current optogenetic parameters. The comparable percept size further suggests optogenetic stimulation may not confer the enhanced spatial resolution often proposed as its key advantage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optogenetic stimulation of primate V1 reveals local laminar and large-scale cortical networks related to perceptual phosphenes
Michael Ortiz-Rios, Beshoy Agayby, … Michael Christoph Schmid·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2021
- Similar neural and perceptual masking effects of low-power optogenetic stimulation in primate V1
Spencer C. Chen, Giacomo Benvenuti, … Eyal Seidemann·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2022
- Behavioral detectability of optogenetic stimulation of inferior temporal cortex varies with the size of concurrently viewed objects.
Rosa Lafer-Sousa, Karen Wang, … Arash Afraz·Current Research in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2022
- Mice detect and discriminate temporal patterns of mesoscale optogenetic cortical stimulation
Gabrielle Stephens, Nikolas A. Francis·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2026
- Cortical visual prosthesis: a detailed large-scale simulation study
Ján Antolík, Quentin Sabatier, … Ryad Benjamin Benosman·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2019
- Precise optical probing of perceptual detection
Gilad M. Lerman, Jonathan V. Gill, … Shy Shoham·Optics in the Life SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019