European Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Goal-directed modulation of stretch reflex gains is reduced in the non-dominant upper limb
Frida TorelliD, Sae FrankliniD, David W. FrankliniD, Michael D. DimitriouiD
Abstract
Most individuals experience their dominant arm as being more dexterous than the non-dominant arm, but the neural mechanisms underlying this asymmetry in motor behaviour are unclear. Using a delayed reach task, we have recently demonstrated strong goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex gains in the dominant upper limb of human participants. Here, we used an equivalent experimental paradigm to address the neural mechanisms that underlie the preparation for reaching movements with the non-dominant upper limb. We found only minor goal-directed differences in the short latency stretch reflex of the non-dominant limb. There were consistent effects of load, preparatory delay duration and target direction on the long latency stretch reflex. However, by comparing stretch reflex responses in the non-dominant arm with those previously documented in the dominant arm, we demonstrate that goal-directed tuning of short and long latency stretch reflexes is markedly weaker in the non-dominant limb. The results indicate that the motor performance asymmetries across the two upper limbs is partly due to the more sophisticated control of reflexive stiffness in the dominant limb, likely facilitated by the superior goal-directed control of muscle spindle receptors. Our findings therefore suggest that independent fusimotor control plays a role in determining performance of complex motor behaviours and support existing proposals that the dominant arm is better supplied for executing more complex tasks, such as trajectory control. Key pointsO_LIMost of us routinely rely on the dominant arm to perform more complex and demanding motor tasks, but the mechanisms enabling the superior motor performance of the dominant limb are unclear. C_LIO_LIA better understanding of the motor asymmetry across the two arms might provide key insight into core sensorimotor principles. C_LIO_LIThis study shows that goal-directed tuning of short and long latency stretch reflexes in the non-dominant arm is markedly weaker than in the dominant arm. C_LIO_LIOur results suggest that the more sophisticated control of reflexive stiffness in the dominant limb, likely facilitated by superior fusimotor control, partly underpins the laterality of motor performance. C_LI
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assistive loading promotes goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex gains
Frida Torell, Sae Franklin, … Michael D. Dimitriou·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2023
- Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
David Córdova Bulens, Tyler Cluff, … Frédéric Crevecoeur·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023
- Preparation duration shapes the goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex responses
Robin Rohlén, Frida Torell, Michael D. Dimitriou·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2025
- Arm dominance emerges through asymmetric practice of complex trajectory shapes inherent to tool use
Ahmet Arac, Nicolas YH Jeong Lee, John W. Krakauer·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2025
- Spinal stretch reflexes support efficient control of reaching
Jeffrey Weiler, Paul L. Gribble, J. Andrew Pruszynski·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2021
- Short latency stretch reflexes depend on the balance of activity in agonist and antagonist muscles during ballistic elbow movements
Zoe Villamar, Daniel Ludvig, Eric Jon Perreault·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2022