Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Experimental Psychology General
Peer-reviewed journal article

Reward influences the allocation but not the availability of resources in visual working memory

James A. BrissendeniD, Tyler James AdkinsiD, Yu Ting Hsu, Taraz G. LeeiD

Abstract

Visual working memory possesses strict capacity constraints which place limits on the availability of resources for encoding and maintaining information. Studies have shown that prospective rewards improve performance on visual working memory tasks, but it remains unclear whether rewards increase total resource availability or rather influence the allocation of resources without affecting availability. Participants performed a continuous report visual working memory task with oriented grating stimuli. On each trial, participants were presented with a priority cue, which signaled the item most likely to be probed, and a reward cue, which signaled the magnitude of a performance-contingent reward. We showed that rewards decreased recall error for cued items and increased recall error for non-cued items. We further demonstrated that rewards produced a tradeoff in the probability of successfully encoding a cued versus a non-cued item rather than a tradeoff in recall precision or the probability of binding errors. Lastly, we showed that rewards only affected resource allocation when participants were given the opportunity to engage proactive control prior to encoding. These findings indicate that rewards influence the flexible allocation of resources during selection and encoding in visual working memory, but do not augment total capacity.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
25
FWCI
3.14
Field percentile
top 8%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBerg '22Yoo '18Ying '26Sahakian '25Nair '26Li '25
86% semantic matchAnimal Behavior & Cognition
R. van den Berg, Q. Zou, Y. Li+1 more·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2022