PLoS Computational BiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method
Abstract
Successful mathematical modeling of biological processes relies on the expertise of the modeler to capture the essential mechanisms in the process at hand and on the ability to extract useful information from empirical data. The very structure of the model limits the ability to infer numerical values for the parameters, a concept referred to as structural identifiability. Most of the available methods to test the structural identifiability of a model are either too complex mathematically for the general practitioner to be applied, or require involved calculations or numerical computation for complex non-linear models. In this work, we present a new analytical method to test structural identifiability of models based on ordinary differential equations, based on the invariance of the equations under the scaling transformation of its parameters. The method is based on rigorous mathematical results but it is easy and quick to apply, even to test the identifiability of sophisticated highly non-linear models. We illustrate our method by example and compare its performance with other existing methods in the literature. Author summaryTheoretical Biology is a useful approach to explain, generate hypotheses, or discriminate among competing theories. A well-formulated model has to be complex enough to capture the relevant mechanisms of the problem, and simple enough to be fitted to data. Structural identifiability tests aim to recognize, in advance, if the structure of the model allows parameter fitting even with unlimited high-quality data. Available methods require advanced mathematical skills, or are too costly for high-dimensional non-linear models. We propose an analytical method based on scale invariance of the equations. It provides definite answers to the structural identifiability problem while being simple enough to be performed in a few lines of calculations without any computational aid. It favorably compares with other existing methods.
- Citations
- 37
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method: relying on scaling symmetries can be misleading
Alejandro F. Villaverde, Gemma Massonis·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2021
- A new method for a priori practical identifiability
P. A. Thompson, B. J. Andersson, … G. Cedersund·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2022
- Predictive power of non-identifiable models
Frederic Grabowski, Paweł Nałęcz‐Jawecki, Tomasz Lipniacki·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2023
- Identifiability analysis for stochastic differential equation models in systems biology
Alexander P. Browning, David James Warne, … Matthew J. Simpson·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Data-informed model reduction for inference and prediction from non-identifiable models
Matthew J. Simpson·Journal of Theoretical BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2025
- Parameter estimation in the age of degeneracy and unidentifiability
Dylan Lederman, Raghav Patel, … Horacio G. Rotstein·MathematicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2022