Sign in
NeuroscienceConference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN)
Peer-reviewed journal article

Privileged representational axes in biological and artificial neural networks

Meenakshi KhoslaiD, Alex H. WilliamsiD, Josh H. McDermottiD, Nancy KanwisheriD

Abstract

How do neurons code information? Recent work emphasizes properties of population codes, such as their geometry and decodable information, using measures that are blind to the native tunings (or axes) of neural responses. But might these representational axes matter, with some privileged systematically over others? To find out, we developed methods to test for alignment of neural tuning across brains and deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs). Across both vision and audition, both brains and DCNNs consistently favored certain axes for representing the natural world. Moreover, the representational axes of DCNNs trained on natural inputs were aligned to those in perceptual cortices, such that axis-sensitive model-brain similarity metrics better differentiated competing models of biological sensory systems. We further show that coding schemes that privilege certain axes can reduce downstream wiring costs and improve generalization. These results motivate a new framework for understanding neural tuning in biological and artificial networks and its computational benefits.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
12
FWCI
2.13
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBenjamin '22Prince '26Elmoznino '24Soni '24Henderson '21Kietzmann '19
68% semantic matchNeuroscience
Ari S. Benjamin, Ling-Qi Zhang, Cheng Qiu+2 more·Nature Communications·Dec 29, 2022· 30 citations