Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The time course of different surround suppression mechanisms
Abstract
What we see depends on the spatial context in which it appears. Previous work has linked the reduction of perceived stimulus contrast in the presence of surrounding stimuli to the suppression of neural responses in early visual cortex. It has also been suggested that this surround suppression depends on at least two separable neural mechanisms, one low-level and one higher-level, which can be differentiated by their response characteristics. In a recent study, we found evidence consistent with these two suppression mechanisms using psychophysical measurements of perceived contrast. Here, we used EEG to demonstrate for the first time that neural responses in the human occipital lobe also show evidence of two separable suppression mechanisms. Eighteen adults (10 female and 8 male) each participated in a total of 3 experimental sessions, in which they viewed visual stimuli through a mirror stereoscope. The first session was used to definitively identify the C1 component, while the second and third comprised the main experiment. ERPs were measured in response to center gratings either with no surround, or with surrounding gratings oriented parallel or orthogonal, and presented either in the same eye (monoptic) or opposite eye (dichoptic). We found that the earliest ERP component (C1; [~]60 ms) was suppressed in the presence of surrounding stimuli, but that this suppression did not depend on surround configuration, suggesting a low-level suppression mechanism which is not tuned for relative orientation. A later response component (N1; [~]160 ms) showed stronger surround suppression for parallel and monoptic stimulus configurations, consistent with our earlier psychophysical results and a higher-level, binocular, orientation-tuned suppression mechanism. We conclude that these two surround suppression mechanisms have distinct response time courses in the human visual system, which can be differentiated using electrophysiology.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Field percentile
- top 29%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Steady-state measures of visual suppression
Daniel H. Baker, Greta Vilidaitė, Alex R. Wade·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2021
- hMT+ Activity Predicts the Effect Of Spatial Attention On Surround Suppression
Merve Kınıklıoğlu, Hüseyin Boyacı·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2025
- Distinct Laminar Processing of Local and Global Context in Primate Primary Visual Cortex
Maryam Bijanzadeh, Lauri Nurminen, … Alessandra Angelucci·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Sep 13, 2018
- Spatial suppression in visual motion perception is driven by inhibition: evidence from MEG gamma oscillations
Elena V. Orekhova, Ekaterina N. Rostovtseva, … Tatiana A. Stroganova·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2020
- Balanced, Orientation-Dependent Dichoptic Masking in Cortex of Visually Normal Humans Measured Using Electroencephalography (EEG)
Jerry J. Zhang, Yichen Tang, … Luke E. Hallum·Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)Peer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2021
- Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses
Michael‐Paul Schallmo, Alex M. Kale, … Scott O. Murray·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2018