The PAX1 locus at 20p11 is a modifier for bilateral cleft lip only
Sarah W. CurtisiD, Daniel Chang, Myoung Keun LeeiD, John R. ShafferiD, Karlijne IndencleefiD, Michael P. EpsteiniD, David J. CutleriD, Jeffrey Clark MurrayiD, Eleanor FeingoldiD, Terri H. BeatyiD, Peter D. ClaesiD, Seth Michael WeinbergiD, Mary L. MarazitaiD, Jenna C. CarlsoniD, Elizabeth J. LeslieiD
Abstract
Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) are the most common craniofacial birth defect in humans and, like many complex traits, OFCs are phenotypically and etiologically heterogenous. The phenotypic heterogeneity of OFCs extends beyond the structures affected by the cleft (e.g., cleft lip (CL) and cleft lip and palate (CLP) to other features, such as the severity of the cleft. Here, we focus on bilateral and unilateral clefts as one dimension of OFC severity. Unilateral clefts are more frequent than bilateral clefts for both CL and CLP, but the genetic architecture of these subtypes is not well understood, and it is not known if genetic variants predispose for the formation of one subtype over another. Therefore, we tested for subtype-specific genetic associations in 44 bilateral CL (BCL) cases, 434 unilateral CL (UCL) cases, 530 bilateral CLP cases (BCLP), 1123 unilateral CLP (UCLP) cases, and unrelated controls (N = 1626), using the mixed-model approach implemented in GENESIS. While no novel loci were found in subtype-specific analyses comparing cases to controls, the genetic architecture of UCL was distinct compared to BCL, with 43.8% of suggestive loci (p 0.05). We further found that SNPs at this locus were associated with normal human nasal shape. Taken together, these results suggest bilateral and unilateral clefts may have differences in their genetic architecture, especially between CL and CLP. Moreover, our results suggest BCL, the rarest form of OFC, may be genetically distinct from the other OFC subtypes. This expands our understanding of genetic modifiers for subtypes of OFCs and further elucidates the genetic mechanisms behind the phenotypic heterogeneity in OFCs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Trio-based GWAS reveals novel loci associated with different forms of isolated cleft lip
Noah Herrick, Zeynep Erdogan-Yildirim, … Mary L. Marazita·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2026
- Variants in CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1 are associated with orofacial cleft risk
Jenna C. Carlson, Xinyi Zhang, … John R. Shaffer·medRxiv·Jan 21, 2025
- A systematic genetic analysis and visualization of phenotypic heterogeneity among orofacial cleft GWAS signals
Jenna C. Carlson, Deepti Anand, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2019
- FAT4 Identified as a Potential Modifier of Orofacial Cleft Laterality
Sarah W. Curtis, Daniel Chang, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2021
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Homogeneity Among Orofacial Cleft Subtypes: Genome-Wide Association Studies in the Cleft Collective
Kyle Dack, Kerstin U. Ludwig, … Sarah Jane Lewis·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2025
- Rare genetic variants in SEC24D modify orofacial cleft phenotypes
Sarah W. Curtis, Jenna C. Carlson, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·medRxiv·Mar 24, 2023