Parallel processing in speech perception with local and global representations of linguistic context
Christian J. BrodbeckiD, Shohini BhattasaliiD, Aura A. L. Cruz HerediaiD, Philip ResnikiD, Jonathan Z. SimoniD, Ellen F. LauiD
Abstract
Speech processing is highly incremental. It is widely accepted that human listeners continuously use the linguistic context to anticipate upcoming concepts, words, and phonemes. However, previous evidence supports two seemingly contradictory models of how a predictive context is integrated with the bottom-up sensory input: Classic psycholinguistic paradigms suggest a two-stage process, in which acoustic input initially leads to local, context-independent representations, which are then quickly integrated with contextual constraints. This contrasts with the view that the brain constructs a single coherent, unified interpretation of the input, which fully integrates available information across representational hierarchies, and thus uses contextual constraints to modulate even the earliest sensory representations. To distinguish these hypotheses, we tested magnetoencephalography responses to continuous narrative speech for signatures of local and unified predictive models. Results provide evidence that listeners employ both types of models in parallel. Two local context models uniquely predict some part of early neural responses, one based on sublexical phoneme sequences, and one based on the phonemes in the current word alone; at the same time, even early responses to phonemes also reflect a unified model that incorporates sentence level constraints to predict upcoming phonemes. Neural source localization places the anatomical origins of the different predictive models in non-identical parts of the superior temporal lobes bilaterally, with the right hemisphere showing a relative preference for more local models. These results suggest that speech processing recruits both local and unified predictive models in parallel, reconciling previous disparate findings. Parallel models might make the perceptual system more robust, facilitate processing of unexpected inputs, and serve a function in language acquisition. Impact statementSpeech processing engages multiple predictive models, using sublexical, word- and sentence contexts in parallel to anticipate upcoming phonemes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 97
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- In spoken word recognition the future predicts the past
Laura Gwilliams, Tal Linzen, … Alec Marantz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2018
- Sensory sharpening and semantic prediction errors unify competing models of predictive processing in human speech comprehension
Fabian Schneider, Helen Blank·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2026
- "What" and "when" predictions jointly modulate speech processing
Ryszard Auksztulewicz, Ozan Bahattin Ödül, … Lucía Melloni·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 11, 2025
- A deep hierarchy of predictions enables assignment of semantic roles in online speech comprehension
Yaqing Su, Lucy J. MacGregor, … Anne‐Lise Giraud·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2022
- Distinct yet neighboring neural populations encode past, future, and surrounding speech context in the human temporal lobe
Marianne de Heer Kloots, Atlas Kazemian, … Laura Gwilliams·bioRxiv·May 14, 2026
- Attention or prediction? Characterizing the top-down influence of predictive context on speech encoding
Alyssa Horng, Wei-Ching Lin, … Edmund C. Lalor·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026