PLoS Computational BiologySystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
An in silico analysis of robust but fragile gene regulation links enhancer length to robustness
Abstract
1Organisms must ensure that expression of genes is directed to the appropriate tissues at the correct times, while simultaneously ensuring that these gene regulatory systems are robust to perturbation. This idea is captured by a mathematical concept called r-robustness, which says that a system is robust to a perturbation in up to r - 1 randomly chosen parameters. In this work we use this idea to investigate the robustness of gene regulation using a sequence level model of the Drosophila melanogaster gene even-skipped. We find that gene regulation can be remarkably sensitive to changes in transcription factor concentrations at the boundaries of expression features, while it is robust to perturbation elsewhere. We also find that the length of sequence used to control an expression feature correlates negatively with the number of nucleotides that are sensitive to mutation in both natural and in silico predicted enhancers. In all cases, the exact degree of robustness obtained is dependent not only on DNA sequence, but also on the local concentration of regulatory factors. By analyzing both natural and synthetic sequences, we provide strong quantitative evidence that increased sequence length makes gene regulatory systems more robust to genetic perturbation.\n\n2 Author SummaryRobustness assures that organisms can survive when faced with unpredictable environments or genetic mutations. In this work, we characterize the robustness of gene regulation using an experimentally validated model of the regulation of the Drosophila gene even-skipped. We use a mathematically precise definition of robustness that allows us to make quantitative comparisons of robustness between different genetic sequences or between different nuclei. From this analysis, we found that genetic sequences that were not previously known to be important for gene regulation reduce sensitivity to genetic perturbation. In contrast, we found that gene regulation can be very sensitive to the levels of regulators. This extreme sensitivity was only observed at the boundaries of expression features, where switch-like behavior is desirable. This highlights the importance of considering context when assessing robustness.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Field percentile
- top 47%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- It takes extremes to be robust
F. Bastos Rocha, M. Dulcetti Vibranovski, L. B. Klaczko·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2019
- Dense encoding of developmental regulatory information may constrain evolvability
T. Fuqua, J. Jordan, … J. Crocker·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2020
- A mutation in the Drosophila melanogaster eve stripe 2 minimal enhancer is buffered by flanking sequences
Francheska López-Rivera, Olivia K. Foster, … Zeba Wunderlich·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2020
- Deciphering the regulatory logic of a Drosophila enhancer through systematic sequence mutagenesis and quantitative image analysis
Yann Le Poul, Yaqun Xin, … Nicolas Gompel·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- Regularization Improves the Robustness of Learned Sequence-to-Expression Models
Bryan Lunt, Saurabh Sinha·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2018
- Distinct mechanisms decommission redundant enhancers to facilitate phenotypic evolution
Areej Said-Ahmad, Noa Shimron, … Ella Preger‐Ben Noon·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026