CoCoA: Conditional Correlation Models with Association Size
Danni TuiD, Bridget W. MahonyiD, Tyler M. MooreiD, Maxwell A. BertoleroiD, Aaron F. Alexander‐BlochiD, Ruben C. GuriD, Dani S. BassettiD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD, Armin RaznahaniD, Russell Taki ShinoharaiD
Abstract
SO_SCPLOWUMMARYC_SCPLOWMany scientific questions can be formulated as hypotheses about conditional correlations. For instance, in tests of cognitive and physical performance, the trade-off between speed and accuracy motivates study of the two variables together. A natural question is whether speed-accuracy coupling depends on other variables, such as sustained attention. Classical regression techniques, which posit models in terms of covariates and outcomes, are insufficient to investigate the effect of a third variable on the symmetric relationship between speed and accuracy. In response, we propose CoCoA (Conditional Correlation Model with Association Size), a likelihood-based statistical framework to estimate the conditional correlation between speed and accuracy as a function of additional variables. We propose novel measures of the association size, which are analogous to effect sizes on the correlation scale, while adjusting for confound variables. In simulation studies, we compare likelihood-based estimators of conditional correlation to semi-parametric estimators adapted from genome association studies, and find that the former achieves lower bias and variance under both ideal settings and model assumption misspecification. Using neurocognitive data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, we demonstrate that greater sustained attention is associated with stronger speed-accuracy coupling in a complex reasoning task while controlling for age. By highlighting conditional correlations as the outcome of interest, our model provides complementary insights to traditional regression modelling and partitioned correlation analyses.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Field percentile
- top 35%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The unbiased estimation of the fraction of variance explained by a model
Dean A. Pospisil, Wyeth Bair·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2021
- Covariate Assisted Principal Regression for Covariance Matrix Outcomes
Yi Zhao, Bingkai Wang, … Xi Luo·BiostatisticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2019
- The unbiased estimation of r2 between two sets of noisy neural responses
Dean A. Pospisil, Wyeth Bair·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2021
- Mapping individual differences in intermodal coupling in neurodevelopment
Ruyi Pan, Sarah M. Weinstein, … Jun Young Park·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Mathematical relations between measures of brain connectivity estimated from electrophysiological recordings for Gaussian distributed data
Guido Nolte, Edgar E. Galindo-Leon, … Andreas Karl Engel·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2020
- Individual differences in cortical processing speed predict cognitive abilities: a model-based cognitive neuroscience account
Anna‐Lena Schubert, Michael D. Nunez, … Joachim Vandekerckhove·Computational Brain & BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2018