Passive motor learning: Oculomotor adaptation in the absence of feedback on behavioral errors

Abstract

Motor adaptation is commonly thought to be a trial-and-error process in which accuracy of movement improves with repetition of behavior. We challenged this view by testing whether erroneous movements are necessary for motor adaptation. In the eye movement system, the association between motor command and errors can be disentangled, since errors in the predicted stimulus trajectory can be perceived even without movements. We modified a smooth pursuit eye movement adaptation paradigm in which monkeys learn to make an eye movement that predicts an upcoming change in target direction. We trained monkeys to fixate on a target while covertly, an additional target initially moved in one direction and then changed direction after 250 ms. Monkeys showed a learned response to infrequent probe trials in which they were instructed to follow the moving target. Further experiments confirmed that probing learning or residual eye movement during fixation did not drive learning. These results show that movement is not necessary for motor adaptation and provide an animal model for studying how passive learning is implemented. The standard model assumes that the interaction between movement and error signals in the cerebellum underlies adaptive learning. Our results indicate that either sensory inputs are sufficient for driving learning in the cerebellum or that learning is implemented partly outside the cerebellum.