Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?
Abstract
Questionnaires are used widely across psychology and permit valuable insights into a persons thoughts and beliefs, which are difficult to derive from task performance measures alone. Given their importance and widespread use, it is vital that questionnaires map onto the cognitive functions they purport to reflect. However, where performance on naturalistic tasks such as imagination, autobiographical memory, future thinking and navigation is concerned, there is a dearth of knowledge about the relationships between task performance and questionnaire measures. Questionnaires are also typically designed to probe a specific aspect of cognition, when instead researchers sometimes want to obtain a broad profile of a participant. To the best of our knowledge, no questionnaire exists that asks simple single questions about a wide range of cognitive functions. To address these gaps in the literature, we recruited a large sample of participants (n = 217), all of whom completed a battery of widely used questionnaires and performed naturalistic tasks involving imagination, autobiographical memory, future thinking and navigation. We also devised a questionnaire that comprised simple single questions about the cognitive functions of interest. There were four main findings. First, imagination and navigation questionnaires reflected performance on their related tasks. Second, memory questionnaires were associated with autobiographical memory vividness and not internal (episodic) details. Third, imagery questionnaires were more associated with autobiographical memory vividness and future thinking than the questionnaires purporting to reflect these functions. Finally, initial exploratory analyses suggested that a broad profile of information can be obtained efficiently using a small number of simple single questions, and these modelled task performance comparably to established questionnaires in young, healthy adults. Overall, while some questionnaires can act as proxies for behaviour, the relationships between memory and future thinking tasks and questionnaires are more complex and require further elucidation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 61
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies
Zsófia Zavecz, Tamás Nagy, … Karolina Janacsek·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- The relationship between object-based spatial ability and virtual navigation performance
Tanya Garg, Pablo Fernández Velasco, … Hugo J. Spiers·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2024
- Identifying the cognitive processes underpinning hippocampal-dependent tasks
Ian A. Clark, Victoria Hotchin, … Eleanor A. Maguire·Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2019
- Characterising strategy use during the performance of hippocampal-dependent tasks
Ian A. Clark, Anna M. Monk, Eleanor A. Maguire·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2020
- Cultural determinants of the gap between self-estimated navigation ability and wayfinding performance: evidence from 46 countries.
Szymon Walkowiak, Antoine Coutrot, … Ed Manley·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2023
- Psychometric validation and clinical correlates of an experiential foraging task
Aaron N. McInnes, Christi R. P. Sullivan, … Alik S. Widge·bioRxiv·Dec 28, 2023