bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Performance of GPT-4 on the American College of Radiology In-Service Examination
David L. PayneiD, Kush PurohitiD, Walter Morales Borrero, Katherine Chung, Max Hao, Mutshipay Mpoy, Michael X. JiniD, Prateek PrasannaiD, Virginia B. HilliD
Abstract
ObjectivesNo study has evaluated the ability of ChatGPT-4 to answer image-rich diagnostic radiology board exam questions or assessed for model drift in GPT-4s image interpretation abilities. In our study we evaluate GPT-4s performance on the American College of Radiology (ACR) 2022 Diagnostic Radiology In-Training Examination (DXIT). MethodsQuestions were sequentially input into GPT-4 with a standardized prompt. Each answer was recorded and overall accuracy was calculated, as was logic-adjusted accuracy, and accuracy on image-based questions. This experiment was repeated several months later to assess for model drift. ResultsGPT-4 achieved 58.5% overall accuracy, lower than the PGY-3 average (61.9%) but higher than the PGY-2 average (52.8%). Adjusted accuracy was 52.8%. GPT-4 showed significantly higher (p = 0.012) confidence for correct answers (87.1%) compared to incorrect (84.0%). Performance on image-based questions was notably poorer (p < 0.001) at 45.4% compared to text-only questions (80.0%), with adjusted accuracy for image questions of 36.4%. When the questions were repeated, GPT-4 chose a different answer 25.5% of the time and there was a small but insignificant decrease in accuracy. DiscussionGPT-4 performed between PGY-2 and PGY-3 levels on the 2022 DXIT, but significantly poorer on image-based questions, and with large variability in answer choices across time points. This study underscores the potential and risks of using minimally-prompted general AI models in interpreting radiologic images as a diagnostic tool. Implementers of general AI radiology systems should exercise caution given the possibility of spurious yet confident responses.
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing Large Language Model Alignment Towards Radio-logical Myths and Misconceptions
Christopher West, Yi Wang·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- Turing Test Inspired Method for Analysis of Biases Prevalent in Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Imaging
Satvik Tripathi, Alisha Isabelle Augustin, … Edward Kim·AI and EthicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2022
- A NOVEL DEEP LEARNING MODEL, RDBCYCYLEGAN-CBAM FOR LOW-DOSE CT IMAGE DENOISING
Osman Assaf, Albert Güveniş·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2026
- Classifying Domains, Benchmarking GPT-4, A Portuguese Dataset for Medical AI Q&A
Felipe Akio Matsuoka, Henrique Nunes Onaga·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2024
- Creating a biomedical knowledge base by addressing GPT inaccurate responses and benchmarking context
Shelby S. Darnell, Rupert W. Overall, … Pjotr Prins·Open Research AfricaPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2025
- Breaking Medical Data Sharing Boundaries by EmployingArtificial Radiographs
Tianyu Han, Sven Nebelung, … Daniel Truhn·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2019