bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
High-quality haploid genomes corroborate 29 chromosomes and highly conserved synteny of genes in Hyles hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)
Anna K. HundsdoerferiD, Tilman SchelliD, Franziska PatzoldiD, Charlotte J WrightiD, Atsuo YoshidoiD, František MareciD, Hana Daneck, Sylke WinkleriD, Carola GreveiD, Lars PodsiadłowskiiD, Michael HilleriD, Martin PippeliD
Abstract
BackgroundMorphological and traditional genetic studies of the young Pliocene genus Hyles have led to the understanding that despite its importance for taxonomy, phenotypic similarity of wing patterns does not correlate with phylogenetic relationship. To gain insights into various aspects of speciation in the Spurge Hawkmoth (Hyles euphorbiae), we assembled a chromosome-level genome and investigated some of its characteristics. ResultsThe genome of a male H. euphorbiae was sequenced using PacBio and Hi-C data, yielding a 504 Mb assembly (scaffold N50 of 18.2 Mb) with 99.9% of data represented by the 29 largest scaffolds forming the haploid chromosome set. Consistent with this, FISH analysis of the karyotype revealed n = 29 chromosomes and a WZ/ZZ (female/male) sex chromosome system. Estimates of chromosome length based on the karyotype image provided an additional quality metric of assembled chromosome size. Rescaffolding the published male H. vespertilio genome resulted in a high-quality assembly (651 Mb, scaffold N50 of 22 Mb) with 98% of sequence data in the 29 chromosomes. The larger genome size of H. vespertilio (average 1C DNA value of 562 Mb) was accompanied by a proportional increase in repeats from 45% in H. euphorbiae (measured as 472 Mb) to almost 55% in H. vespertilio. Several wing pattern genes were found on the same chromosomes in the two species, with varying amounts and positions of repetitive elements and inversions possibly corrupting their function. ConclusionsOur two-fold comparative genomics approach revealed high gene synteny of the Hyles genomes to other Sphingidae and high correspondence to intact Merian elements, the ancestral linkage groups of Lepidoptera, with the exception of three simple fusion events. We propose a standardized approach for genome taxonomy using nucleotide homology via scaffold chaining as the primary tool combined with Oxford plots based on Merian elements to infer and visualize directionality of chromosomal rearrangements. The identification of wing pattern genes promises future understanding of the evolution of forewing patterns in the genus Hyles, although further sequencing data from more individuals are needed. The genomic data obtained provide additional reliable references for further comparative studies in hawkmoths (Sphingidae).
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: genome assembly
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ghost W chromosomes and unique genome architecture in ghost moths of the family Hepialidae
Anna Voleníková, Ken Sahara, … Petr Nguyen·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2023
- The Easter Egg Weevil (Pachyrhynchus) genome reveals synteny in Coleoptera across 200 million years of evolution
Matthew H. Van Dam, Analyn Cabras, … Athena Wai Lam·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 30, 2021
- Chromosome-level genome assembly of the swallowtail butterfly Parides eurimedes mylotes is a valuable resource for studying wing coloration
Praveen Kumar Jaya Balaji, Tim Davalan, … Viola Valentina Vogler‐Neuling·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026
- Phylloxera and aphids show distinct features of genome evolution despite similar reproductive modes
Z. Li, A. Z. Xue, … N. A. Moran·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2023
- Genomic evidence reveals three sequential W-autosome fusions in Heliconius butterflies
N. Rueda-M, C. Pardo-Diaz, … C. Salazar·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2023
- Synteny-based genome assembly for 16 species of Heliconius butterflies, and an assessment of structural variation across the genus
Fernando Seixas, Nathaniel B. Edelman, James Mallet·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2021