Causes and consequences of facultative sea crossing in a soaring migrant
P. Becciu, S. Rotics, N. Horvitz, M. Kaatz, W. Fiedler, D. Zurell, A. Flack, F. Jeltsch, M. Wikelski, R. Nathan, N. Sapir
Abstract
O_LIStudying the causes and consequences of route selection in animal migration is important for understanding the evolution of migratory systems and how they may be affected by environmental factors at various spatial and temporal scales. One key decision during migration is whether to cross "high transport cost" areas, or to circumvent them. Soaring birds may face this choice when encountering waterbodies where convective updrafts are weak or scarce. Crossing these waterbodies requires flying using energetically costly flapping flight, while circumventing them over land permits energetically cheap soaring. C_LIO_LIWe tested how several atmospheric factors (e.g., wind, thermal uplift) and geographic, seasonal and state-related factors (sex and age) affected route selection in migrating white storks (Ciconia ciconia). We used 196 GPS tracks of 70 individuals either crossing or circumventing the north-easternmost section of the Mediterranean Sea, over Iskenderun Bay in southern Turkey. C_LIO_LIWe found that westward and southward winds promoted a cross-bay journey in spring and autumn, respectively, acting as tailwinds. Also, overall weaker winds promoted a sea crossing in spring. Sea crossing was associated with flapping flight and higher values of Overall Dynamic Body Acceleration (ODBA) and resulted in higher ground speed than travel over land. C_LIO_LIThe combined environmental conditions and the effects of route selection on movement-related energy costs and speed were likely responsible for an increase in the time spent flying and distance travelled of migrating storks that decided to cross the bay during spring. Notably, daily travel distances of spring migrants crossing the bay were 60 kilometres longer than those of land-detouring birds, allowing them to reach their destination faster but likely incurring a higher energetic flight cost. No such benefit was found during autumn. C_LIO_LIOur findings confirm that atmospheric conditions can strongly affect bird route selection. Consequently, migration timing, speed and movement-related energy expenditure differed considerably between the two migratory seasons and the two route choices, highlighting a time-energy trade-off in the migration of white storks. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The interplay of wind and uplift facilitates over-water flight in facultative soaring birds
E. Nourani, G. Bohrer, … K. Safi·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2020
- Dynamics of the energy seascape can explain intra-specific variations in sea-crossing behaviour of soaring birds
E. Nourani, W. M. G. Vansteelant, … K. Safi·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2019
- Experience reduces route selection on conspecifics by the collectively migrating white stork
H. Bronnvik, E. Nourani, … A. Flack·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2023
- Cranes soar on thermal updrafts behind cold fronts as they migrate across the sea
S. Pekarsky, D. Shohami, … R. Nathan·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2023
- Experience does not change the importance of wind support for migratory route selection by a soaring bird
H. Bronnvik, K. Safi, … E. Nourani·Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Soaring migrants flexibly respond to sea-breeze in a migratory bottleneck: using first derivatives to identify behavioural adjustments over time
P. Becciu, D. Troupin, … N. Sapir·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2022