Reliability of brain metrics derived from a Time-Domain Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy System
Julien DuboisiD, Ryan M. FieldiD, Sami JawhariD, Erin M. KochiD, Zahra M. AghajaniD, Naomi Miller, Katherine L. PerdueiD, Moriah Taylor
Abstract
With the growing interest in establishing brain-based biomarkers for precision medicine, there is a need for noninvasive, scalable neuroimaging devices that yield valid and reliable metrics. Kernels second-generation Flow2 Time-Domain Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (TD-fNIRS) system meets the requirements of noninvasive and scalable neuroimaging, and uses a validated modality to measure brain function. In this work, we investigate the test-retest reliability (TRR) of a set of metrics derived from the Flow2 recordings. We adopted a repeated-measures design with 49 healthy participants, and quantified TRR over multiple time points and different headsets--in different experimental conditions including a resting state, a sensory, and a cognitive task. Results demonstrated high reliability in resting state features including hemoglobin concentrations, head tissue light attenuation, amplitude of low frequency fluctuations, and functional connectivity. Additionally, passive auditory and Go/No-Go inhibitory control tasks each exhibited similar activation patterns across days. Notably, areas with the highest reliability were in auditory regions during the auditory task, and right prefrontal regions during the Go/No-Go task, consistent with prior literature. This study underscores the reliability of Flow2-derived metrics, supporting its potential to actualize the vision of using brain-based biomarkers for diagnosis, treatment selection and treatment monitoring of neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing the Validity and Reliability of HD-DOT TD-fNIRS Resting-State Measurements in Rapid Succession Data Collection Settings
Mohammad P. Oveisi, Davide Momi, … John David Griffiths·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2024
- Test-Retest Reliability of Task-based and Resting-state Blood Oxygen Level Dependence and Cerebral Blood Flow measures
Štefan Holiga, Fabio Sambataro, … Juergen Dukart·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2018
- Evaluating the reliability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy data in the context of a reasoning paradigm
Patrick G. Kelly, Heather Bortfeld, … Keanan J. Joyner·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2026
- What is the test-retest reliability of common task-fMRI measures? Newempirical evidence and a meta-analysis
Maxwell L. Elliott, Annchen R. Knodt, … Ahmad R. Hariri·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2020
- Time-Domain Diffuse Optical Tomography for Precision Neuroscience
Yaroslav Chekin, Dakota Decker, … Victor Szczepanski·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Test-retest reliability of functional brain network characteristics using resting-state EEG and graph theory
Bahar Moezzi, Brenton G. Hordacre, … Mitchell R. Goldsworthy·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2018