bioRxivBioengineering
Antagonistic Co-contraction Can Minimize Muscular Effort in Systems with Uncertainty
Abstract
Muscular co-contraction of antagonistic muscle pairs is often observed in human movement, but it is considered inefficient and it can currently not be predicted in simulations where muscular effort or metabolic energy is minimized. Here, we investigated the relationship between minimizing effort and muscular co-contraction in systems with random uncertainty to see if muscular co-contraction can minimize effort in such system. We also investigated the effect of time delay in the muscle, by varying the time delay in the neural control as well as the activation time constant. We solved optimal control problems for a one-degree-of-freedom pendulum actuated by two identical antagonistic muscles, using forward shooting, to find controller parameters that minimized muscular effort while the pendulum remained upright in the presence of noise added to the moment at the base of the pendulum. We compared a controller with and without feedforward control. Task precision was defined by bounding the root mean square deviation from the upright position, while different perturbation levels defined task difficulty. We found that effort was minimized when the feedforward control was nonzero, even when feedforward control was not necessary to perform the task, which indicates that co-contraction can minimize effort in systems with uncertainty. We also found that the optimal level of co-contraction increased with time delay, both when the activation time constant was increased and when neural time delay was added. Furthermore, we found that for controllers with a neural time delay, a different trajectory was optimal for a controller with feedforward control than for one without, which indicates that simulation trajectories are dependent on the controller architecture. Future movement predictions should therefore account for uncertainty in dynamics and control, and carefully choose the controller architecture. The ability of models to predict co-contraction from effort or energy minimization has important clinical and sports applications. If co-contraction is undesirable, one should aim to remove the cause of co-contraction rather than the co-contraction itself.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Co-Contraction Embodies Uncertainty: An Optimal Feedforward Strategy for Robust Motor Control
Bastien Berret, Dorian Verdel, … Frédéric Jean·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2024
- Stochastic optimal open-loop control as a theory of force and impedance planning via muscle co-contraction
Bastien Berret, Frédéric Jean·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2020
- Co-contraction uses dual control of agonist-antagonist muscles to improve motor performance
Christopher M. Saliba, Michael J. Rainbow, … Stephen Harold Scott·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2020
- Independent synaptic inputs to motor neurons driving antagonist muscles
Daniele Borzelli, Taian Vieira, … Andrea d’Avella·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2022
- An approximate stochastic optimal control framework to simulate nonlinear neuromusculoskeletal models in the presence of noise
Tom Van Wouwe, Lena H. Ting, Friedl De Groote·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2022
- The minimum intervention principle of optimal control relates the uncontrolled manifold to muscle synergies
N. Sharma·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2023