Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) in Malawi: Implementation Gaps and Challenges for Timely Alert
Tsung-Shu Joseph WuiD, Matthew KagoliiD, Jens KaasbølliD, Gunnar Aksel BjuneiD
Abstract
ObjectiveThe emerging and recent 2014 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks rang the bell to call upon efforts from globe to assist resource-constrained countries to strengthen public health surveillance system for early response. Malawi adopted the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy to develop its national surveillance system since 2002 and revised its guideline to fulfill the International Health Regulation (IHR) requirements in 2014. This study aimed to understand the state of IDSR implementation and differences between guideline and practice for future disease surveillance system strengthening.\n\nMethodsThis was a mixed-method observational study. Quantitative data were to analyze completeness and timeliness of surveillance system performance from national District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2). Qualitative data were collected through interviews with 29 frontline health service providers from the selected district and key informants of the IDSR system implementation and administration at district and national levels.\n\nFindingsThe current IDSR system showed relatively good completeness (76.4%) but poor timeliness (41.5%) of total expected monthly reports nationwide and zero weekly reports. The challenges of IDSR implementation revealed through qualitative data included lack of supervision, inadequate resources for training and difficulty to implement weekly report due to overwhelming paperwork at frontline health services.\n\nConclusionsThe differences between IDSR technical guideline and actual practice were huge. The developing information technology infrastructure in Malawi and emerging mobile health (mHealth) technology can be opportunities for the country to overcome these challenges and improve surveillance system to have better timeliness for the outbreaks and unusual events detection.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 58
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Validation of the Early Warning and Response System (EWARS) for dengue outbreaks: Evidence from the national vector control program in Mexico
L. Hussain-Alkhateeb, D. Benitez-Valladares, … G. S. Tejeda·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2021
- High Real-time Reporting of Domestic and Wild Animal Diseases Following Rollout of Mobile Phone Reporting System in Kenya
M. K. Njenga, N. Kemunto, … P. Munyua·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2020
- InfoDengue: a nowcasting system for the surveillance of dengue fever transmission
Cláudia T Codeço, Oswaldo G Cruz, … Flavio C Coelho·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2016
- Machine-Learning prognostic models from the 2014-16 Ebola outbreak: data-harmonization challenges, validation strategies, and mHealth applications
Andrés Colubri, Mary‐Anne Hartley, … Pardis Christine Sabeti·EClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewed·May 1, 2019
- Rural populations exposed to Ebola Virus Disease respond positively to localised case handling: evidence from Sierra Leone
E. Y. Mokuwa, H. Maat·PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseasesPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2020
- Sentinel versus passive surveillance for measuring changes in dengue incidence: Evidence from three concurrent surveillance systems in Iquitos, Peru
Sandra Olkowski, Steven T. Stoddard, … Thomas W. Scott·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2016