Author

L. A. Schimanski

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Scientific Communication & Education· 3

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Approach:experimental assay· 2 Approach:benchmark study· 1 Research Focus:benchmarking· 1 Research Focus:clustering· 1 Research Focus:database / resource· 1 Approach:statistical model· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

E. C. McKiernan· 3 shared J. P. Alperin· 3 shared M. T. Niles· 3 shared E. Morales· 2 shared D. Dawson· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2019-2022 · peak 1/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

5 top collaborators · 10 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

3 shared papersScientific Communication & Education

E. C. McKiernan

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

3 papers

Recent·Most cited

The role of collegiality in academic review, promotion, and tenure

D. Dawson, E. Morales, E. C. McKiernan, L. A. Schimanski, M. T. Niles, J. P. Alperin

This study examines how collegiality is addressed in academic review, promotion, and tenure processes across different institutions and disciplines, finding it is often mentioned but rarely defined or assessed.

bioRxiv · Jan 5, 2022Scientific Communication & Education

How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact in research

E. Morales, E. C. McKiernan, M. T. Niles, L. A. Schimanski, J. P. Alperin

This study surveys faculty from US and Canadian universities to understand how they define research quality, prestige, and impact, finding overlapping yet varied definitions with no clear demographic patterns.

bioRxiv · Apr 14, 2021Scientific Communication & Education

Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations

M. T. Niles, L. A. Schimanski, E. C. McKiernan, J. P. Alperin

The paper surveys academics to explore publishing priorities and their alignment with review, promotion, and tenure expectations, finding discrepancies between personal values and perceived peer values.

bioRxiv · Jul 21, 2019Scientific Communication & Education