Genetics in MedicineGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Atlas-CNV: a validated approach to call Single-Exon CNVs in the eMERGESeq gene panel
Theodore Chiang, Xiuping LiuiD, Tsung-Jung Wu, Jianhong HuiD, Fritz Joachim SedlazeckiD, Simon J. WhiteiD, Daniel J. SchaidiD, Mariza de AndradeiD, Gail Pairitz JarvikiD, David R. CrossliniD, Ian B. StanawayiD, David CarrelliD, John J. ConnollyiD, Hakon H. HakonarsoniD, Emily GroopmaniD, Ali G. GharaviiD, Alexander Fedotov, Weimin BiiD, Magalie S. LeduciD, David R. MurdockiD, Yunyun JiangiD, Linyan MengiD, Christine M. EngiD, Shu WeniD, Yaping YangiD, , Richard A. GibbsiD
Abstract
PurposeTo provide a validated method to confidently identify exon-containing copy number variants (CNVs), with a low false discovery rate (FDR), in targeted sequencing data from a clinical laboratory with particular focus on single-exon CNVs.\n\nMethodsDNA sequence coverage data are normalized within each sample and subsequently exonic CNVs are identified in a batch of samples (midpool), when the target log2 ratio of the sample to the batch median exceeds defined thresholds. The quality of exonic CNV calls is assessed by C-scores (Z-like scores) using thresholds derived from gold standard samples and simulation studies. We integrate an ExonQC threshold to lower FDR and compare performance with alternate software (VisCap).\n\nResultsThirteen CNVs were used as a truth set to validate Atlas-CNV and compared with VisCap. We demonstrated FDR reduction in validation, simulation and 10,926 eMERGESeq samples without sensitivity loss. Sixty-four multi-exon and 29 single-exon CNVs with high C-scores were assessed by MLPA.\n\nConclusionsAtlas-CNV is validated as a method to identify exonic CNVs in targeted sequencing data generated in the clinical laboratory. The ExonQC and C-score assignment can reduce FDR (identification of targets with high variance) and improve calling accuracy of single-exon CNVs respectively. We proposed guidelines and criteria to identify high confidence single-exon CNVs.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 28
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A machine-learning approach for accurate detection of copy-number variants from exome sequencing
Vijay Kumar Pounraja, Gopal Jayakar, … Santhosh Girirajan·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019
- A comparison of tools for copy-number variation detection in germline whole exome and whole genome sequencing data
Miglė Gabrielaitė, Mathias Husted Torp, … Frederik Otzen Bagger·CancersPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2021
- SavvyCNV: genome-wide CNV calling from off-target reads
Thomas William Laver, Elisa De Franco, … Matthew Neil Wakeling·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2022
- Systematic and comprehensive benchmarking of an exome sequencing based germline copy-number variant detection pipeline to detect clinically relevant CNVs
Ramakrishnan Rajagopalan, Jill R. Murrell, … Laura K. Conlin·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2019
- Ximmer: A System for Improving Accuracy and Consistency of CNV Calling from Exome Data
Simon Sadedin, Justine A. Ellis, … Alicia Oshlack·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2018
- CNVkit: Copy number detection and visualization for targeted sequencing using off-target reads
Eric Talevich, A. Hunter Shain, … Boris C. Bastian·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2014