Sign in
NeuroscienceExperimental Brain Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Dual agonist and antagonist muscle vibration produces a bias in end point with no change in variability

Gregg EschelmulleriD, John Timothy Inglis, Hyosub E. KimiD, Romeo ChuaiD

Abstract

Muscle spindles provide critical proprioceptive feedback about muscle length to the central nervous system (CNS). Single muscle tendon vibration can stimulate muscle spindles, causing participants to misjudge limb position, while dual muscle tendon vibration is thought to produce a noisy proprioceptive system. It is currently unclear exactly how the CNS uses kinesthetic feedback from the agonist and antagonist muscles during target-directed reaches. The purpose of the current project was to investigate the effects of agonist, antagonist, and dual agonist/antagonist during target-directed reaching. Using an elbow extension task, we found that antagonist muscle vibration produced an undershooting effect relative to the no-vibration control, while agonist muscle vibration produced an overshooting effect relative to the no-vibration control. Neither of the single muscle vibrations produced any change in the variable error of the movements. While it was originally hypothesized that dual agonist/antagonist vibration would increase participants variable error with no change in bias, the opposite was found. Participants undershot relative to the no-vibration control with no change in variable error. Overall, the results from this study suggest that dual vibration does not necessarily create a noisy proprioceptive system but can produce a bias in end point.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
0.57
Field percentile
top 34%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.