bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
A Benchmark of Modern Statistical Phasing Methods
Abstract
Modern statistical phasing methods efficiently and accurately infer haplotype phase in large genomic samples, and their performance is critical for downstream analyses. However, rigorously evaluating phasing accuracy remains challenging. Here we demonstrate the use of synthetic diploids generated from male X chromosome sequences to benchmark and compare three commonly-used phasing methods: Beagle 5.4, SHAPEIT 4, and Eagle v2.4.1. Our evaluation reveals highly correlated error rates across all methods, although we observe distinct variation among methods within error types. Specifically, Eagle v2.4.1 is characterized by a higher frequency of switch errors, whereas SHAPEIT 4 displays a higher rate of flip (double-switch) errors. These patterns are consistent across diverse populations. Additionally, we observe an enrichment of errors at both CpG sites and rare variant sites, particularly for flip errors. Validating these results in autosomal trio data, we observe similar trends between the methods and error patterns, though with an increased flip error rate, a discrepancy that may be biased by genotype error.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phasing millions of samples achieves near perfect accuracy, enabling parent-of-origin classification of variants
Cole M. Williams, Jared O’Connell, … Amy L. Williams·bioRxiv·May 6, 2024
- Benchmarking phasing software with a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree
Claire Oget, Naveen Kumar Kadri, … Tom Druet·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 14, 2022
- Evaluation of consensus strategies for haplotype phasing
Ziad Al Bkhetan, Gursharan Chana, … Benjamin Goudey·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2020
- Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel
Po-Ru Loh, Petr Danecek, … Alkes L Price·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2016
- An accurate phasing tool via high-quality heterozygous variations
Jun Zhang, Fan Nie, Jianxin Wang·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2025
- Genotype error biases trio-based estimates of haplotype phase accuracy
Brian L. Browning, Sharon R. Browning·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022