Evaluation of consensus strategies for haplotype phasing

MotivationHaplotype phasing is a critical step for many genetic applications but incorrect estimates of phase can negatively impact downstream analyses. One proposed strategy to improve phasing accuracy is to combine multiple independent phasing estimates to overcome the limitations of any individual estimate. As such a strategy is yet to be thoroughly explored, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of consensus strategies for haplotype phasing, exploring their performance, along with their constituent tools, across a range of real and simulated datasets with different data characteristics and on the downstream task of genotype imputation. ResultsBased on the outputs of existing phasing tools, we explore two different strategies to construct haplotype consensus estimators: voting across outputs from multiple phasing tools and multiple outputs of a single non-deterministic tool. We find the consensus approach from multiple tools reduces switch error by an average of 10% compared to any constituent tool when applied to European populations and has the highest accuracy regardless of population ethnicity, sample size, SNP-density or SNP frequency. Furthermore, a consensus provides a small improvement indirectly the downstream task of genotype imputation regardless of which genotype imputation tools were used. Our results provide guidance on how to produce the most accurate phasing estimates and the tradeoffs that a consensus approach may have. AvailabilityOur implementation of consensus haplotype phasing, consHap, is available freely at https://github.com/ziadbkh/consHap.