Precise Instruction and Consideration of the Vertical and Horizontal Force Component Increase Validity and Reliability of the 90:20 Isometric Posterior Chain Test
Dominic Michael RaspiD, Florian Kurt PaternosteriD, Jan KerniD, Ansgar Schwirtz
Abstract
Hamstring injuries are associated with decreased hamstring strength. Matinlauri et al.s 90:20 Isometric Posterior Chain Test (90:20 IPCT) efficiently assesses hamstring strength, but has not been validated so far. Furthermore, their rather unprecise original instruction allows high variability in test execution. We added a new instruction and parameters and examined, whether this measure leads to increased reliability and validity. We assessed hamstring strength of 23 sport students via the 90:20 IPCT under the original instruction, to exert vertical force, and our new instruction, to exert vertical and horizontal force. Instead of only using bare vertical force as outcome parameter under the original (Fz_V) and our new instruction (Fz_VH), we also calculated the resultant force (Fres_VH) and the applied torque onto the force place (M_F_ortho_VH). To test for validity, we correlated the outcome parameters with peak torque of gold standard dynamometry. Furthermore, we measured muscle activities of the mm. rectus femoris, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and gluteus maximus under our new instruction and compared them to those under the original parameter (Fz_V) via one sample t-tests. To evaluate reliability, tests were repeated on two separate days, for which we calculated intra class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs). Our new instruction and parameters (Fz_VH, Fres_VH, M_F_ortho_VH) showed better validity (mean r = 0.77, r = 0.81, and r = 0.85) and equally good or better reliability (ICCs: 0.87, 0.89, and 0.94; CVs: 4.7 %, 4.1 %, and 4.7 %) than the original instruction and parameter (Fz_V) (mean r = 0.70; ICC: 0.91; CV: 5.6 %). There were no differences in muscle activities between the parameters and instructions of the 90:20 IPCT. We recommend our new instruction and the applied torque onto the force plate as it makes the 90:20 IPCT a more reliable and valid tool to assess hamstring strength.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Two forms of isometric muscle function: Interpersonal motor task supports a distinction between a holding and a pushing isometric muscle action
L. V. Schaefer, F. N. Bittmann·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2020
- Hamstrings muscle dynamics during the Nordic hamstring exercise and high-speed running
Nicos Haralabidis, Kristen Steudel, … Scott L. Delp·Journal of BiomechanicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2026
- Knee and Hip Joint Dynamics Differ between Sprinting and Nordic Hamstring Exercises
Kristen Steudel, Nicos Haralabidis, … Scott L. Delp·Journal of BiomechanicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 4, 2026
- Quadriceps and hamstrings coactivation in exercises used in prevention and rehabilitation of hamstring strain injury in young soccer players
Gonzalo Torres, David Chorro, … Enrique Navarro·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2019
- Optimizing athlete assessment of maximal force and rate of development A comparison of the isometric squat and mid-thigh pull
P. Read, J. Silva, … V. Sideris·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2020
- The ExtRA Capacity Test: Reliability and validity study of a new tool for assessing shoulder muscle performance
H. Ford, J. Lewis, … A. F. Shaheen·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2022