bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
Optimizing athlete assessment of maximal force and rate of development A comparison of the isometric squat and mid-thigh pull
Abstract
This study compared force-time characteristics and muscle activity between the isometric squat (ISQ) and mid-thigh pull (IMTP) in both bilateral (ISQBI and IMTPBI) and unilateral (ISQUNI and IMTPUNI) stance. Peak force (PF), rate-of-force (RFD) (e.g. 0-300ms) and EMG of the multifidus, erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL) and soleus were recorded in ten recreationally trained males. PF was significantly greater during the ISQBI vs. IMTPBI (p=0.016, ES=1.08) but not in the unilateral test mode although effects remained moderate (ES=0.62). A trend indicated heightened RFD300ms (p = 0.083; ES=0.81) during the IMTPBI vs. the ISQBI, but these effects were smaller in the unilateral test (ES = 0.51). Greater (p<0.0001) EMG for VL (ES=1.00-1.13) and VM were recorded during the ISQ compared to IMTP modes in both modes (ES = 0.97 - 1.18). Greater BF EMG (p = 0.030, ES = 0.31) was shown in IMTPBI vs. ISQBI and these effects were stronger in the unilateral modes (p = < 0.05; ES = 0.81 - 0.83). Significantly greater ST activation was shown in both IMTPUNI (p < 0.05; ES = 0.69-0.76) and IMTPBI (p < 0.001; ES = 1.08). These findings indicate that ISQ results in elevated PF, whereas, RFD is heightened during the IMTP and these differences are more pronounced in bilateral modes. Greater activation of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles are expected in ISQ and IMPT respectively.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A biomechanical comparison of the jerk, back jerk, vertical jump and jump squat.
J. Liu·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2021
- Two forms of isometric muscle function: Interpersonal motor task supports a distinction between a holding and a pushing isometric muscle action
L. V. Schaefer, F. N. Bittmann·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2020
- Motor unit recruitment patterns of the quadriceps differ between continuous high- and low-torque isometric knee extension to momentary failure
J. Murphy, E. Hodson-Tole, … J. Steele·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2021
- Hip thrust and back squat training elicit similar gluteus muscle hypertrophy and transfer similarly to the deadlift
D. L. Plotkin, M. A. Rodas, … M. D. Roberts·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2023
- Why humans are stronger but not faster after isometric strength training: specific neural, not muscular, motor unit adaptations
Alessandro Del Vecchio, A. Casolo, … Dario Farina·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2021
- Greater distal activation of the biceps femoris long head reflects proximodistal differences in motor unit action potential properties.
José Carlos dos Santos Albarello, Hélio V. Cabral, … Líliam Fernandes de Oliveira·Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2025