Low-Coverage Genome Sequencing Outperforms Target Enrichment Phylogenomics
Michael G. BranstetteriD, Felipe V. FreitasiD, Ligia R. BenavidesiD, Silas BossertiD, Bryan N. DanforthiD, Elizabeth A. MurrayiD
Abstract
Genome-scale data have transformed phylogenetic inference, yet most studies continue to rely on reduced-representation approaches that target a subset of loci to reduce cost and increase taxon sampling. Although effective, these methods require specialized laboratory workflows, constrain long-term data reuse, and may perform poorly with degraded DNA. Low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS) offers a streamlined alternative: shallow to moderate sequencing of complete genomes followed by bioinformatic extraction of loci of interest. Despite its promise, lcWGS has not been rigorously benchmarked against targeted enrichment using historical museum specimens. Here, we directly compared lcWGS and ultraconserved element (UCE) target enrichment across taxonomically diverse bee specimens collected between 1934 and 2021. Both data types were generated from the same Illumina libraries, enabling a controlled, head-to-head evaluation. Using standard UCE analytical pipelines, we quantified locus recovery, gene-tree support, and phylogenetic performance across sequencing methods and specimen age classes. We further assessed recovery of additional marker classes, including mitogenomes, BUSCO loci, and UCEs from a newly-designed, expanded probe set. Across all age categories, lcWGS consistently outperformed target enrichment, recovering more UCE loci and substantially longer alignments, with the largest gains observed in highly degraded specimens. Gene trees derived from lcWGS exhibited higher mean bootstrap support and greater topological concordance, translating into improved species-tree inference. In addition, lcWGS enabled recovery of markedly more non-target loci, expanding analytical flexibility beyond the original marker set. These results demonstrate that lcWGS not only matches but frequently exceeds the performance of targeted enrichment in museum-based phylogenomics, while providing broader genomic utility. As sequencing costs continue to decline, lcWGS represents a robust and forward-looking strategy for phylogenetic research, particularly in taxa with modest genome sizes and challenging DNA quality.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- One Method to Sequence Them All? Comparison between Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Target Enrichment (TE) of museum specimens from the moth families Epicopeiidae and Sematuridae (Lepidoptera)
E. Call, V. G. Twort, … N. Wahlberg·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2023
- The power to resolve relationships: identifying incongruence and precision of reduced representation and genome-wide data in phylogenomics and population genomics
Joshua M. Felton, Chloe Jelley, … Jacob B. Landis·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2025
- Patchwork: alignment-based retrieval and concatenation of phylogenetic markers from genomic data
F. Thalen, C. G. Koehne, C. Bleidorn·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2022
- WASTER: Practical de novo phylogenomics from low-coverage short reads
Chao Zhang, Rasmus Nielsen·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2026
- On the impact of reference selection on variant calling in phylogenomics: How to avoid systematic error in target-enrichment studies of non-model organisms
Guoyi Zhang, Gerasimos Cassis, Frank Köhler·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2025
- Sequence capture of ultraconserved elements from bird museum specimens
John McCormack, Whitney L.E. Tsai, Brant C Faircloth·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2015