Characterization of heterogeneous bioinformatics training needs in the AI era
Geert van GeestiD, Valeria Di ColaiD, Monique Zahn‐ZabaliD, Diana MarekiD, Grégoire RossieriD, Wandrille DucheminiD, Joana Carlevaro-FitaiD, Deepak K. TanwariD, Marion Vaucher, Patricia M. PalagiiD
Abstract
Bioinformatics training providers serve heterogeneous audiences, a challenge sharpened by fast-evolving technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI). Analyzing training-needs surveys in aggregate can mask this heterogeneity. We present a network-based clustering protocol that groups respondents by the similarity of their Likert-type topic ratings: respondents form a Spearman correlation network, and community detection groups them into learner profiles with shared training needs, independent of demographics. We demonstrate the protocol on the 2026 SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) training needs survey (n=260), covering topics, barriers, and formats. We identified four interpretable learner profiles: AI and data, infectious disease genomics, functional genomics, and biochemistry, imaging & AI. Each had distinct topic priorities, barriers, and format preferences that an aggregate analysis hides. For example, LLM-based knowledge extraction ranked 2nd overall but only 16th in the infectious disease genomics profile, whereas phylogenetics ranked 17th overall but first there. Across profiles, AI/LLM skills and reproducible data practices were in high demand, whereas AI-assisted learning was, unexpectedly, the least preferred format. Because the protocol requires only a shared Likert scale, it is reusable for other training-needs assessments; the implementation is openly available. Profile-based curricula can target each group's topics, formats, and barriers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A global perspective on bioinformatics training needs
M. D. Brazas, C. Brooksbank, … T. K. Attwood·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2017
- Bioinfo-Bench: A Simple Benchmark Framework for LLM Bioinformatics Skills Evaluation
Qiyuan Chen, Cheng Deng·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2023
- AI in Practice: A Multilingual Survey of 2025 BioHackathon Participants
Nattawet Sriwichai, Lucas Feriau, … Chatarin Wangsanuwat·GigabytePeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2026
- Skill-Augmented Frontier Agents Nearly Saturate BixBench-Verified-50
Xiaoyu Zhang·bioRxiv·May 1, 2026
- Peer teaching as bioinformatics training strategy: incentives, challenges, and benefits.
N.-T. Rahman, C. Meyer, … R. Obaid·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2021
- Bioinformatics Core Competencies for Undergraduate Life Sciences Education
Melissa A. Wilson Sayres, Charles R. Hauser, … Mark Pauley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2018