GigaScienceGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Assessing species coverage and assembly quality of rapidly accumulating sequenced genomes
Abstract
Ambitious initiatives to coordinate genome sequencing of Earths biodiversity mean that the accumulation of genomic data is growing rapidly. In addition to cataloguing biodiversity, these data provide the basis for understanding biological function and evolution. Accurate and complete genome assemblies offer a comprehensive and reliable foundation upon which to advance our understanding of organismal biology at genetic, species, and ecosystem levels. However, ever-changing sequencing technologies and analysis methods mean that available data are often heterogeneous in quality. In order to guide forthcoming genome generation efforts and promote efficient prioritisation of resources, it is thus essential to define and monitor taxonomic coverage and quality of the data. Here we present an automated analysis workflow that surveys genome assemblies from the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), assesses their completeness using the relevant Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologue (BUSCO) datasets, and collates the results into an interactively browsable resource. We apply our workflow to produce a community resource of available assemblies from the phylum Arthropoda, the Arthropoda Assembly Assessment Catalogue. Using this resource, we survey current taxonomic coverage and assembly quality at the NCBI, we examine how key assembly metrics relate to gene content completeness, and we compare results from using different BUSCO lineage datasets. These results demonstrate how the workflow can be used to build a community resource that enables large-scale assessments to survey species coverage and data quality of available genome assemblies, and to guide prioritisations for ongoing and future sampling, sequencing, and genome generation initiatives.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 46
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics
Robert Michael Waterhouse, Mathieu Seppey, … Evgeny M. Zdobnov·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2017
- nf-core/genomeqc: a best-practice pipeline for comparing genome and assembly quality
Christopher D. R. Wyatt, Fernando Duarte Frutos, … Seirian Sumner·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- Towards a genome sequence for every animal: where are we now?
Scott Hotaling, Joanna L. Kelley, Paul B. Frandsen·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2021
- miniBUSCO: a faster and more accurate reimplementation of BUSCO
Neng Huang, Heng Li·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2023
- In genomes we trust: assessing genomic reliability within the family Nectriaceae
Alessandra Villani, Veronica Ghionna, … Riccardo Baroncelli·Microbiological ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2026
- Universal orthologs infer deep phylogenies and improve genome quality assessments
Md Nafis Ul Alam, Cristian Román‐Palacios, … Rod A. Wing·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2025