Effects of stimulus timing on the acquisition of an olfactory working memory task in head-fixed mice
Josefine ReuschenbachiD, Janine Kristin ReinertiD, Izumi FukunagaiD
Abstract
Knowing what factors affect the acquisition of a behavioural task is central to understanding the mechanisms of learning and memory. It also has practical implications, as animal behavioural experiments used to probe cognitive functions often require long training durations. Delayed Match (or Non-Match)-to-Sample (DMS/DNMS) tasks are relatively complex tasks used to study working memory and sensory perception, but their use in the mouse remains hampered by the lengthy training involved. In this study, we assessed two aspects of stimulus timing on the acquisition of an olfactory DNMS task: how the sample-test odour delay durations and the reward timing affect the acquisition rate. We demonstrate that head-fixed mice learn to perform an olfactory DNMS task more quickly when the initial training uses a shorter sample-test odour delay without detectable loss of generalisability. Unexpectedly, we observed a slower task acquisition when the odour-reward interval was shorter. This effect was accompanied by a shortening of reaction times and more frequent sporadic licking. Analysis of this result using a drift-diffusion model indicated that a primary consequence of early reward delivery is a lower decision bound. Since an accurate performance with a lower decision bound requires greater discriminability in the sensory representations, this may underlie the slower learning rate with early reward arrival. Together, our results reflect the possible effects of stimulus timing on stimulus encoding and its consequence on the acquisition of a complex task.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adolescent and adult mice use both incremental reinforcement learning and short term memory when learning concurrent stimulus-action associations
Juliana B. Chase, Liyu Xia, … Linda Wilbrecht·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2024
- Reward learning and working memory: effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period
G. Elliott Wimmer, Russell Alan Poldrack·Memory & CognitionPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2021
- Dynamics of visual perceptual decision-making in freely behaving mice
Wen-Kai You, Shreesh P. Mysore·eneuroPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2022
- The minimal behavioral time window for reward conditioning in the nucleus accumbens of mice
Kenji Yamaguchi, Yoshitomo Maeda, … Sho Yagishita·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2022
- Neural correlates of episodic memory modulated by temporally delayed rewards
Jungsun Yoo, Seokyoung Min, … Sanghoon Han·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2021
- Short-term auditory priming in freely-moving mice
Shir Sivroni, Hadas E. Sloin, Eran Stark·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2023