Structural variants in the barley gene pool: precision and sensitivity to detect them using short-read sequencing and their association with gene expression and phenotypic variation
Marius WeisweileriD, Christopher ArltiD, Po‐Ya WuiD, Delphine Van InghelandtiD, Thomas HartwigiD, Benjamin StichiD
Abstract
In human genetics, several studies have shown that phenotypic variation is more likely to be caused by structural variants (SV) than by single nucleotide variants (SNV). However, accurate while cost-efficient discovery of SV in complex genomes remains challenging. The objectives of our study were to (i) facilitate SV discovery studies by benchmarking SV callers and their combinations with respect to their sensitivity and precision to detect SV in the barley genome, (ii) characterize the occurrence and distribution of SV clusters in the genomes of 23 barley inbreds that are the parents of a unique resource for mapping quantitative traits, the double round robin population, (iii) quantify the association of SV clusters with transcript abundance, and (iv) evaluate the use of SV clusters for the prediction of phenotypic traits. In our computer simulations based on a sequencing coverage of 25x, a sensitivity >70% and precision >95% was observed for all combinations of SV types and SV length categories if the best combination of SV callers was used. We observed a significant (P < 0.05) association of gene-associated SV clusters with global gene-specific gene expression. Furthermore, about 9% of all SV clusters that were within 5kb of a gene were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with the gene expression of the corresponding gene. The prediction ability of SV clusters was higher compared to that of single nucleotide polymorphisms from an array across the seven studied phenotypic traits. These findings suggest the usefulness of exploiting SV information when fine mapping and cloning the causal genes underlying quantitative traits as well as the high potential of using SV clusters for the prediction of phenotypes in diverse germplasm sets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative epigenomics across the barley pangenome links structural variation to regulatory genome function
Zihao Zhu, Erwang Chen, … Nils Stein·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- A robust benchmark for germline structural variant detection
Justin M. Zook, Nancy Fisher Hansen, … Marc Salit·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2019
- Genomic Rearrangements Considered as Quantitative Traits
Martha Imprialou, André Kahles, … Richard Mott·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2017
- Structural variants contribute to phenotypic variation in maize
Nathan S. Catlin, Husain I. Agha, … Emily B. Josephs·Molecular EcologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2025
- SaVor - A Reproducible Structural Variant Calling and Benchmarking Platform from Short-Read Data
Trevor Mugoya, Arun Sethuraman·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2025
- Evaluation of computational genotyping of Structural Variations for clinical diagnoses.
Varuna Chander, Richard A. Gibbs, Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019