Differential excitability of PV and SST neurons results in distinct functional roles in inhibition stabilization of Up-states
Abstract
Up-states are the best-studied example of an emergent neural dynamic regime. Computational models based on a single class of inhibitory neurons indicate that Up-states reflect bistable dynamical systems in which positive feedback is stabilized by strong inhibition and predict a paradoxical effect in which increased drive to inhibitory neurons results in decreased inhibitory activity. To date, however, computational models have not incorporated empirically defined properties of PV and SST neurons. Here we first, experimentally characterized the frequencycurrent (F-I) curves of pyramidal, PV, and SST neurons and confirmed a sharp difference between the threshold and slopes of PV and SST neurons. The empirically defined F-I curves were incorporated into a three-population computational model that simulated the empirically-derived firing rates of pyramidal, PV, and SST neurons. Simulations revealed that the intrinsic properties were sufficient to predict that PV neurons are primarily responsible for generating the nontrivial fixed points representing Up-states. Simulations and analytical methods demonstrated that while the paradoxical effect is not obligatory in a model with two classes of inhibitory neurons, it is present in most regimes. Finally, experimental tests validated predictions of the model that the Pyr{leftrightarrow}PV inhibitory loop is stronger than the Pyr{leftrightarrow}SST loop. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTMany cortical computations, such as working memory, rely on the local recurrent excitatory connections that define cortical circuit motifs. Up-states are among the simplest and best studied examples of neural dynamic regimes that rely on recurrent excitatory excitation. However, this positive feedback must be held in check by inhibition. To address the relative contribution of PV and SST neurons we characterized the intrinsic input-output differences between these classes of inhibitory neurons, and using experimental and theoretical methods show that the higher threshold and gain of PV leads to a dominant role in network stabilization.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Field percentile
- top 21%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inhibition stabilization and paradoxical effects in recurrent neural networks with short-term plasticity
Yue Kris Wu, Julijana Gjorgjieva·Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2023
- Tuned inhibitory firing rate and connection weights as emergent network properties
Fereshteh Lagzi, Adrienne L. Fairhall·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2022
- Behavioral state and stimulus strength regulate the role of somatostatin interneurons in stabilizing network activity
Celine M. Cammarata, Yingming Pei, … Lindsey L. Glickfeld·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Cholinergic and adrenergic modulation sculpts parallel inhibition of SST-INs in visual cortex
Jyoti Gupta, Chiayu Chiu, … Michael J. Higley·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2026
- Inhibitory cell type heterogeneity in a spatially structured mean-field model of V1
Soon Ho Kim, Hannah Choi·Physical review. EPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2026
- Persistent Interruption in Parvalbumin Positive Inhibitory Interneurons: Biophysical and Mathematical Mechanisms
Carol M Upchurch, Christopher J. Knowlton, … Carmen C. Canavier·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2024