Variational and phase response analysis for limit cycles with hard boundaries, with applications to neuromechanical control problems
Yangyang WangiD, Jeffrey P. GilliD, Hillel J. ChieliD, Peter J. ThomasiD
Abstract
Motor systems show an overall robustness, but because they are highly nonlinear, understanding how they achieve robustness is difficult. In many rhythmic systems, robustness against perturbations involves response of both the shape and the timing of the trajectory. This makes the study of robustness even more challenging. To understand how a motor system produces robust behaviors in a variable environment, we consider a neuromechanical model of motor patterns in the feeding apparatus of the marine mollusk Aplysia californica (Shaw et al., 2015; Lyttle et al., 2017). We established in (Wang et al., 2021) the tools for studying combined shape and timing responses of limit cycle systems under sustained perturbations and here apply them to study robustness of the neuromechanical model against increased mechanical load during swallowing. Interestingly, we discover that nonlinear biomechanical properties confer resilience by immediately increasing resistance to applied loads. In contrast, the effect of changed sensory feedback signal is significantly delayed by the firing rates hard boundary properties. Our analysis suggests that sensory feedback contributes to robustness in swallowing primarily by shifting the timing of neural activation involved in the power stroke of the motor cycle (retraction). This effect enables the system to generate stronger retractor muscle forces to compensate for the increased load, and hence achieve strong robustness. The approaches that we are applying to understanding a neuromechanical model in Aplysia, and the results that we have obtained, are likely to provide insights into the function of other motor systems that encounter changing mechanical loads and hard boundaries, both due to mechanical and neuronal firing properties.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Incorporating buccal mass planar mechanics and anatomical features improves neuromechanical modeling of Aplysia feeding behavior
Michael J. Bennington, Ashlee S. Liao, … Victoria A. Webster‐Wood·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2024
- Neuromechanical phase lag predicts material and neural control properties in Caenorhabditis elegans
Jack E. Denham, Thomas Ranner, Netta Cohen·bioRxiv·May 1, 2018
- Balancing central control and sensory feedback produces adaptable and robust locomotor patterns in a spiking, neuromechanical model of the salamander spinal cord
Alessandro Pazzaglia, Andrej Bičanski, … Auke Jan Ijspeert·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2025
- Context-dependent mechanical reconfiguration is necessary for multifunctional behavior in a constrained hydrostat
Michael J. Bennington, Stephen M. Rogers, … Victoria A. Webster‐Wood·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2026
- Performance Limitations in Sensorimotor Control: Tradeoffs between Neural Computation and Accuracy in Tracking Fast Movements
Shreya Saxena, Sridevi V. Sarma, Munther A. Dahleh·Neural ComputationPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2020
- A model of neural population dynamics for flexible sensorimotor control
Hari Teja Kalidindi, Frédéric Crevecoeur·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026