bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Novel model combining intrinsic and learned behaviours captures divergent effects of dopaminergic drugs on different types of motivation
Madeleine E. BartlettiD, P. Michael FurlongiD, Terrence C. StewartiD, Jeff OrchardiD, Megan G. JacksoniD
Abstract
Motivation-based symptoms occur in an array of neurological and neurodegenerative disorders, including Schizophrenia and Parkinsons Disease. Unfortunately, there is, as yet, no agreed treatment approach. To establish a better understanding of motivation, and so highlight potential avenues for treatment, motivation is often investigated using operant behavioural paradigms such as the Effort for Reward (EfR) task. Performance on these tasks is thought to be influenced by reinforcement learning (RL) mechanisms, such that disorders of motivation can be described in terms of altered interactions with RL processes. Recently, foraging behaviour has been increasingly adopted as an ethologically valid approach to investigating cognitive mechanisms, including motivation. One example of this is the recently developed Effort Based Foraging task (EBF). Foraging behaviour, unlike the strictly controlled and contrived operant behavioural paradigms, involves a series of complex behavioural processes, each potentially driven by different cognitive processes. It is therefore important to identify which portion of the foraging behavioural sequence is driven by the same RL mechanisms as classical operant behavioural paradigms, and therefore can be used to investigate motivation. In this work we set out to establish whether the same RL mechanisms could be used to account for behaviours observed in both EfR and EBF tasks. We identified where, within the EBF task, RL mechanisms were no long sufficient and developed a novel hybrid model of the behaviour. This model successfully accounted for external influences on motivation, including previously unpredicted effects of clinically used dopaminergic drugs. This work reveals that motivation in complex, naturalistic tasks cannot be fully explained by learning-based models alone. Incorporating intrinsic behavioural drives may be needed as neuroscience moves toward more ethological behavioural assays.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Validation of a non-appetitive effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in male mice
F. Xeni, C. Marangoni, M. G. Jackson·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2023
- Dopamine alters motor learning performance in the presence and absence of feedback
Li‐Ann Leow, Ashley Huey-Ryu Tan, … Hannah L. Filmer·Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2026
- Mesolimbic dopamine adapts the rate of learning from action
Luke T. Coddington, Sarah E. Lindo, Joshua Tate Dudman·NaturePeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2023
- L-DOPA reduces model-free control of behavior by attenuating the transfer of value to action
Nils B. Kroemer, Ying Lee, … Michael N. Smolka·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2018
- Dopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learning.
Karima Chakroun, Antonius Wiehler, … Jan Peters·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2022
- Male mouse strain variation reveals divergent phenotypes for extrinsic and intrinsic reward motivation
Eleanor W. Grayson, Emma S. J. Robinson, Megan G. Jackson·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026