bioRxivEcology
An initial assessment of the sustainability of waterbird harvest in the United Kingdom
Abstract
O_LIThere is a need to assess the sustainability of wild bird harvest in the United Kingdom (UK), and more widely, across Europe. Yet data on populations and harvest sizes are limited. C_LIO_LIWe used a Demographic Invariant Method (DIM) to estimate Potential Excess Growth (PEG) for populations of UK wintering waterbirds and calculated a Sustainable Harvest Index (SHI) for each. We compared this with population trends and conservation classifications (e.g. Birds of Conservation Concern; BoCC) to assess the sustainability of harvests and the utility of these classifications. C_LIO_LIOur approach found evidence for potential overharvest of mallard Anas platyrhynchos, Eurasian teal Anas crecca, gadwall Mareca strepera, Canada geese Branta canadensis, greylag geese Anser anser and woodcock Scolopax rusticola. Whether DIM methods predict overharvest is highly dependent on estimates of maximum population growth rates inferring PEG. We found estimates of maximum population growth to be variable across a range of different methods. C_LIO_LIWe found no relationship between SHI and short-term wintering trends or conservation classification under the UKs BoCC framework. There was however a positive relationship between SHI and long-term wintering trends. Policy Implications: Our results suggest that UK based harvest is unlikely to be a major determinant of population trends for the majority of UK overwintering waterbirds, but harvest rates for some species may exceed that required to maintain stationary population growth. The lack of a relationship between conservation classifications and SHI strongly suggests that such conservation classifications are not an appropriate tool for making decisions about harvest management. Instead, our assessment provides the basis for a framework to make evidence-based decisions on sustainable harvest levels in the face of incomplete data. There is currently no clear policy instrument in the UK to support such a framework via controls on either harvest effort or mortality of waterfowl. C_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Exploring sources of uncertainty in the estimate of waterfowl harvest in the United Kingdom
Matthew B. Ellis, Hannah M Lewis, Tom C. Cameron·Wildlife BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2026
- Legal Harvest of Shorebirds and Resident Game Birds on a Caribbean island: A Martinique Case Study
Amelia R. Cox, Eduardo Gallo‐Cajiao, … Christian Roy·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2025
- Evaluating threshold management for willow grouse harvest: tracking open and closed areas during 12 years.
Tomas Willebrand, Maria Hörnell‐Willebrand, … Eivind Flittie Kleiven·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- A national assessment of waterbird hunting in coastal wetlands of Suriname, South America
David S. Mizrahi, Arie L. Spaans, … Christian Roy·Conservation Science and PracticePeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Estimating Species-specific U.S. Waterfowl Harvest
Ben C. Augustine, Jeffrey Andrew Royle·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2024
- A global indicator of utilised wildlife populations: regional trends and the impact of management
L. McRae, R. Freeman, … N. D. Burgess·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2020