A global indicator of utilised wildlife populations: regional trends and the impact of management
L. McRae, R. Freeman, J. Geldmann, G. B. Moss, L. Kjaer-Hansen, N. D. Burgess
Abstract
The sustainable use of wildlife is a core aspiration of biodiversity conservation but is the subject of intense debate in the scientific literature as to how, and whether, species are best used and managed. While both positive and negative outcomes of sustainable use are known for specific taxa or local case studies, a global and regional picture of trends in wildlife populations in use is lacking. We use a global data set of over 11,000 time-series to derive indices of utilised and not utilised wildlife populations and assess global and regional changes, principally for mammals, birds and fishes. We also assess whether management makes a measurable difference to wildlife population trends, especially for the utilised species populations. Our results show that wildlife population trends globally are negative, but with utilised populations tending to decline more rapidly, especially in Africa and the Americas. Crucially, where utilised populations are managed, using a variety of mechanisms, there is a positive impact on the trend. It is therefore true that use of species can both be a driver of negative population trends, or a driver of species recovery, with numerous species and population specific case examples making up these broader trends. This work is relevant to the evidence base for the IPBES Sustainable Use Assessment, and to the development of indicators of sustainable use of species under the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework being developed under the Convention on Biological Diversity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List
S. M. E. Marsh, M. Hoffmann, … M. Bohm·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2020
- Socioeconomics drive population change in the world's largest carnivores
T. F. Johnson, N. J. B. Isaac, … M. Gonzalez-Suarez·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2021
- How much data do we need? Reliability and data deficiency in global vertebrate biodiversity trends
S. Dove, M. Bohm, … D. J. Murrell·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2023
- Spatial distribution and research trend of illegal activities and the factors associated with wild mammal population declines in protected areas
A. A. Rija, R. Critchlow, … C. Beale·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2019
- Overconfidence undermines global wildlife abundance trends
T. F. Johnson, A. P. Beckerman, … R. Freckleton·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2022
- Assessing the global impact of targeted conservation actions on species abundance
S. Jellesmark, T. M. Blackburn, … M. Hoffmann·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2022