bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Experimental evidence for sexual selection against inbred males when it truly counts
Regina Vega-Trejo, Megan Head, J. Scott Keogh, Michael Jennions
Abstract
Although there are many correlational studies, unbiased estimates of inbreeding depression only come from experimental studies that create inbred and outbred individuals. Few such studies determine the extent to which inbreeding depression in males is due to natural or sexual selection. Importantly, traits that are closely related to fitness are predicted to be most strongly affected by inbreeding depression, so measuring fitness or key fitness components, rather than phenotypic traits, is necessary to estimate inbreeding depression accurately. Here, we experimentally created inbred and outbred male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) by mating full-sibs (f=0.25). We show this led to a 23% reduction in genome-wide heterozygosity. Males were then raised on different diets early in life. We then allowed adult males to compete freely for females to test if inbreeding, early diet, and their interaction affect a males share of paternity. Early diet had no effect on paternity, but outbred males sired almost twice as many offspring as inbred males. We also found that males with a relatively long gonopodium (intromittent organ) had greater reproductive success. We demonstrate that inbreeding has important consequences because it negatively affects a key component of male fitness. Given there was no difference in adult mortality this finding can only be due to inbreeding negatively affecting sexually selected traits.
- organism: mouse
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Are sexually selected traits affected by a poor environment early in life?
Regina Vega-Trejo, Michael Jennions, Megan Head·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2016
- Sexual selection on body size, genitals and heterozygosity: effects of demography and habitat complexity
Megan L. Head, Andrew T. Kahn, … Michael D. Jennions·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2016
- Experimental evidence that investment into ejaculation and mating effort impose different life history trade-offs
M.-H. J. Chung, R. J. Fox, M. D. Jennions·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2024
- Polygyny carries costs in both sexes in Trinidadian guppies
Tess Makenna van der Walle, Flavio Di Giorgio, … Anja Felmy·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2026
- Genetic compatibility exceeds possible good genes effects of sexual selection in lake char
L. Garaud, D. Nusbaumer, … C. Wedekind·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2022
- House fly proto-Y chromosomes differentially affect courtship success regardless of social context and female type
Alireza Ghaem-Maghami, Rebecca Warneke, Richard P. Meisel·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2026