Motor signals modulate cortical but not subcortical processing of self-initiated sounds
Laura RaiffiD, Gabrielle Butler, Kailyn A. McFarlaneiD, Bharath ChandrasekaraniD, Kevin Richard SitekiD
Abstract
When we produce sounds ourselves, the brain modulates the auditory neural response through an efference copy mechanism, allowing us to distinguish between self-initiated and externally generated auditory inputs. However, the precise level of the auditory pathway at which this attenuation occurs remains unclear. While evidence from animal models suggests that early auditory processing of self-generated sounds may be modulated by corticofugal signaling, localized cortical modulation would preserve the high-fidelity subcortical sound encoding while allowing flexible, context-dependent processing at higher levels. To probe potential motor influences in the early auditory system, we collected scalp-recorded frequency following responses (FFRs) from 33 normal-hearing adults during active (self-initiated) and passive (externally presented) listening conditions using a 170 ms speech stimulus. Data were collected with a vertical montage that emphasizes subcortical generators of the FFR. We observed no significant differences in the FFR between active and passive conditions in spectral power, response amplitude, pitch tracking, onset latency, or phase consistency. In contrast, cortical event-related potentials showed motor-induced suppression (MIS): reduced early peak amplitudes in the active condition after correcting for motor signals, increased phase consistency prior to auditory feedback, and more precise phase consistency at sound offset. In addition to indicating FFRs can be collected during a wider range of behavioral tasks without substantial motor contamination, our observation of the canonical MIS in cortical signals but not in FFRs suggests that MIS of self-initiated sounds primarily affects later stages of auditory processing rather than the early encoding reflected in the FFR.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cortical correlates of the auditory frequency-following and onset responses: EEG and fMRI evidence
Emily BJ Coffey, Gabriella Musacchia, Robert J Zatorre·The Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2016
- Auditory cortical generators of the Frequency Following Response are modulated by intermodal attention
Thomas Hartmann, Nathan Weisz·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2019
- Motor-evoked neural responses in auditory cortex are associated with improved sensitivity to self-generated sounds
Daniel Reznik, Noa Hacohen, … Roy Mukamel·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2020
- No evidence of musical training influencing the cortical contribution to the speech-FFR and its modulation through selective attention
Jasmin Riegel, Alina Schüller, Tobias Reichenbach·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2024
- Deconstructing the Cortical Sources of Frequency Following Responses to Speech: A Cross-species Approach
G. Nike Gnanateja, Kyle Rupp, … Bharath Chandrasekaran·bioRxiv·May 17, 2021
- Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception
Gavin M. Bidelman, Sara Momtaz·Neuroscience LettersPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2021