Sign in
NeuroscienceeLife
Peer-reviewed journal article

Intracerebral mechanisms explaining the impact of incidental feedback on mood state and risky choice

Romane CecchiiD, Fabien VinckieriD, Jiří HammeriD, Petr MarusičiD, Anca NicaiD, Sylvain RheimsiD, Agnès TrébuchoniD, Emmanuel J. BarbeauiD, Marie DenuelleiD, Louis Georges MaillardiD, Lorella MinottiiD, Philippe KahaneiD, Mathias PessiglioneiD, Julien BastiniD

Abstract

Identifying factors whose fluctuations are associated with choice inconsistency is a major issue for rational decision theory. Here, we investigated the neuro-computational mechanisms through which mood fluctuations may bias human choice behavior. Intracerebral EEG data were collected in a large group of participants (n = 30), while they were performing interleaved quiz and choice tasks. Neural baseline activity preceding choice onset was confronted first to mood level, estimated by a computational model integrating the feedbacks received in the quiz task, and then to the weighting of option attributes, in a computational model predicting risk attitude in the choice task. Results showed that 1) elevated broadband gamma activity (BGA) in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsal anterior insula (daIns) was respectively signaling periods of high and low mood, 2) increased vmPFC and daIns BGA respectively promoted and tempered risk taking by overweighting gain versus loss prospects. Thus, incidental feedbacks induce brain states that correspond to different moods and bias the comparison of safe and risky options. More generally, these findings might explain why people experiencing positive (or negative) outcome in some part of their life tend to expect success (or failure) in any other.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.