bioRxivMicrobiology
hogwash: Three Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies in Bacteria
Abstract
Bacterial genome-wide association studies (bGWAS) capture associations between genomic variation and phenotypic variation. Convergence based bGWAS methods identify genomic mutations that occur independently multiple times on the phylogenetic tree in the presence of phenotypic variation more often than is expected by chance. This work introduces hogwash, an open source R package that implements three algorithms for convergence based bGWAS. Hogwash additionally contains two burden testing approaches to perform gene- or pathway-analysis to improve power and increase convergence detection for related but weakly penetrant genotypes. To identify optimal use cases, we applied hogwash to data simulated with a variety of phylogenetic signals and convergence distributions. These simulated data are publicly available and contain the relevant metadata regarding convergence and phylogenetic signal for each phenotype and genotype. Hogwash is available for download from GitHub. DATA SUMMARYO_LIhogwash is available from GitHub under the MIT license (https://github.com/katiesaund/hogwash) and can be installed using the R commands install.packages("devtools") devtools::install_github("katiesaund/hogwash") C_LIO_LIThe simulated data used in this manuscript and the code to generate it are available from GitHub (https://github.com/katiesaund/simulate_data_for_convergence_based_bGWAS) C_LI IMPACT STATEMENTWe introduce hogwash, an R package with three methods for bacterial genome-wide association studies. There are two methods for handling binary phenotypes, including an implementation of PhyC(1), as well as one method for handling continuous phenotypes. We formulate novel indices quantifying the relationship between phenotype convergence and genotype convergence on a phylogenetic tree. These indices shape an intuitive understanding for the ability of hogwash to detect significant intersections of phenotype convergence and genotype convergence and how to interpret hogwash outputs.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking bacterial genome-wide association study (GWAS) methods using simulated genomes and phenotypes
Morteza Mahmoudi Saber, B. Jesse Shapiro·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2020
- microGWAS: a computational pipeline to perform large scale bacterial genome-wide association studies
Judit Burgaya, Bamu F. Damaris, … Marco Galardini·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2025
- H3AGWAS : A portable workflow for Genome Wide Association Studies
Jean‐Tristan Brandenburg, Lindsay V. Clark, … Scott Hazelhurst·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2022
- prewas: Data pre-processing for more informative bacterial GWAS
Katie Saund, Zena Lapp, … Evan S. Snitkin·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 20, 2020
- The advent of genome-wide association studies for bacteria
Peter E Chen, B Jesse Shapiro·Current Opinion in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2015
- A Phylogenetic Method To Perform Genome-Wide Association Studies In Microbes That Accounts For Population Structure And Recombination
C. Collins, X. Didelot·bioRxiv·May 22, 2017