BMC BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A consensus-based ensemble approach to improve transcriptome assembly
Adam VoshalliD, Sairam BeheraiD, Xiangjun LiiD, Xiao-Hong Yu, Kushagra Kapil, Jitender S. DeoguniD, John ShankliniD, Edgar B. CahooniD, Etsuko N. MoriyamaiD
Abstract
BackgroundSystems-level analyses, such as differential gene expression analysis, co-expression analysis, and metabolic pathway reconstruction, depend on the accuracy of the transcriptome. Multiple tools exist to perform transcriptome assembly from RNAseq data. However, assembling high quality transcriptomes is still not a trivial problem. This is especially the case for non-model organisms where adequate reference genomes are often not available. Different methods produce different transcriptome models and there is no easy way to determine which are more accurate. Furthermore, having alternative-splicing events exacerbates such difficult assembly problems. While benchmarking transcriptome assemblies is critical, this is also not trivial due to the general lack of true reference transcriptomes. ResultsIn this study, we first provide a pipeline to generate a set of the benchmark transcriptome and corresponding RNAseq data. Using the simulated benchmarking datasets, we compared the performance of various transcriptome assembly approaches including both de novo and genome-guided methods. The results showed that the assembly performance deteriorates significantly when alternative transcripts (isoforms) exist or for genome-guided methods when the reference is not available from the same genome. To improve the transcriptome assembly performance, leveraging the overlapping predictions between different assemblies, we present a new consensus-based ensemble transcriptome assembly approach, ConSemble. ConclusionsWithout using a reference genome, ConSemble using four de novo assemblers achieved an accuracy up to twice as high as any de novo assemblers we compared. When a reference genome is available, ConSemble using four genome-guided assemblies removed many incorrectly assembled contigs with minimal impact on correctly assembled contigs, achieving higher precision and accuracy than individual genome-guided methods. Furthermore, ConSemble using de novo assemblers matched or exceeded the best performing genome-guided assemblers even when the transcriptomes included isoforms. We thus demonstrated that the ConSemble consensus strategy both for de novo and genome-guided assemblers can improve transcriptome assembly. The RNAseq simulation pipeline, the benchmark transcriptome datasets, and the script to perform the ConSemble assembly are all freely available from: http://bioinfolab.unl.edu/emlab/consemble/.
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: genome assembly
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Field percentile
- top 37%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Establishing evidenced-based best practice for the de novo assembly and evaluation of transcriptomes from non-model organisms
Matthew D MacManes·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2016
- Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species
Arnaud Ungaro, Nicolas Pech, … André Gilles A·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2017
- ClusTrast: a short read de novo transcript isoform assembler guided by clustered contigs
Karl Johan Westrin, Warren W. Kretzschmar, Olof Emanuelsson·bioRxiv·Jan 2, 2022
- The evaluation of RNA-Seq de novo assembly by PacBio long read sequencing
Yifan Yang, Michael Gribskov·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2019
- Towards accurate, reference-free differential expression: A comprehensive evaluation of long-read de novo transcriptome assembly
Feng Yan, Pedro L. Baldoni, … N. Davidson·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2025
- Effect of de novo transcriptome assembly on transcript quantification
Ping‐Han Hsieh, Yen‐Jen Oyang, Chien‐Yu Chen·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2019