Web-based Psychoacoustics: Hearing Screening, Infrastructure, and Validation
Brittany A. Mok, Vibha ViswanathaniD, Agudemu BorjiginiD, Ravinderjit SinghiD, Homeira I. Kafi, Hari BharadwajiD
Abstract
Anonymous web-based experiments are increasingly and successfully used in many domains of behavioral research. However, online studies of auditory perception, especially of psychoacoustic phenomena pertaining to low-level sensory processing, are challenging because of limited available control of the acoustics, and the unknown hearing status of participants. Here, we outline our approach to mitigate these challenges and validate our procedures by comparing web-based measurements to labbased data on a range of classic psychoacoustic tasks. Individual tasks were created using jsPsych, an open-source javascript front-end library. Dynamic sequences of psychoacoustic tasks were implemented using Django, an open-source library for web applications, and combined with consent pages, questionnaires, and debriefing pages. Subjects were recruited via Prolific, a web-based human-subject marketplace. Guided by a meta-analysis of normative data, we developed and validated a screening procedure to select participants for (putative) normal-hearing status; this procedure combined thresholding of scores in a suprathreshold cocktail-party task with filtering based on survey responses. Headphone use was standardized by supplementing procedures from prior literature with a binaural hearing task. Individuals meeting all criteria were re-invited to complete a range of classic psychoacoustic tasks. Performance trends observed in re-invited participants were in excellent agreement with lab-based data for fundamental frequency discrimination, gap detection, sensitivity to interaural time delay and level difference, comodulation masking release, word identification, and consonant confusions. Our results suggest that web-based psychoacoustics is a viable complement to lab-based research. Source code for our infrastructure is also provided.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robust and efficient online auditory psychophysics
Sijia Zhao, Christopher A. Brown, … Frederic Dick·Trends in HearingPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch
Alice E. Milne, Roberta Bianco, … Maria Chait A·Behavior Research MethodsPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2020
- Reliability of web-based affective auditory stimulus presentation
Tricia X. F. Seow, Tobias U. Hauser·Behavior Research MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2021
- Reward enhances online participants' engagement with a demanding auditory task
Roberta Bianco, Gordon Mills, … Maria Chait A·Trends in HearingPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Visual perception and workload of office workers in various acoustic conditions
J. Kaminska, J. Radosz, L. Kapica·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2023
- Portable Automated Rapid Testing ( PART ) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population
E. S. Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, T. Stavropoulos, … A. R. Seitz·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2020