Sign in
Molecular BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Single-point mutation alters odorant receptor sensitivity associated with host plant specialization in Spodoptera moths

Arthur ComteiD, Maxence LalisiD, Sai Zhang, Albert Thor ThorhallssoniD, Riccardo Moracci, Jérémy GévariD, Nicolas MontagnéiD, Jérémie TopiniD, Andrew MitchelliD, Sébastien FiorucciiD, Emmanuelle Jacquin‐JolyiD

Abstract

Host specialization in herbivorous insects is often associated with divergence in chemosensory abilities. Here, we investigated the possible contribution of odorant receptors (ORs) in host plant restriction in the lily moth Spodoptera picta, a species specialized on Amaryllidaceae. Manual annotation of S. picta ORs in its genome revealed a repertoire similar in size and composition to those of its polyphagous sister species, S. littoralis and S. litura, suggesting that specialization did not involve major gene loss or expansion in the lily moth. To assess functional divergence beyond gene number, we applied a large scaled structure-based virtual screening approach to the entire OR repertoires of these three Spodoptera species, generating ligand-binding profiles for 120,591 volatile compounds. Among 69 1:1:1 OR orthologs, 24 exhibited divergent predicted binding spectra. We pinpointed OR29 that we also found to be highly expressed in both male and female antennae of S. picta through a RNAseq approach. Functional assays demonstrated that S. picta OR29 acquired heightened sensitivity to limonene enantiomers, volatiles emitted by host Amaryllidaceae inflorescences. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that a single amino acid substitution within the predicted binding region underlies this shift in sensitivity. These results show that host specialization in S. picta has not been accompanied by significant OR repertoire remodeling, but rather by subtle molecular changes that fine-tune receptor sensitivity to host-derived volatiles.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISZhang '23Godfrey '24Danielson '26Borrero-Ech '18Prieto-Godi '21Yohe '20
74% semantic matchNeuroscience
Dandan Zhang, Xiaoqing Hou, Daniel Powell+1 more·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2023· 2 citations