Sign in
EcologyGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
Peer-reviewed journal article

The evolution of Hutchinsonian climatic niche hypervolumes in gymnosperms

Fernanda S. CaroniD, Jānis Lazovskis, David F. R. P. BurslemiD, Juliano MorimotoiD

Abstract

AimThe niche is a fundamental concept in theoretical and experimental ecology and is used to describe a wide range of ecological processes from species interaction with the environment to community assemblies. A common way to represent the niche is through a multidimensional geometry known as the Hutchinsonian niche hypervolume. Ecological theory predicts that niche hypervolumes have properties such as holes with broader eco-evolutionary significance, but we lack a comprehensive empirical study of niche hypervolume properties and their evolutionary significance. LocationGlobal Time periodHolocene Major taxa studiedGymnosperms MethodsWe conducted for the first time a systematic and comprehensive test of the evolution of Hutchinsonian niche hypervolume properties (volume and holes) across 65 genera and 12 families of gymnosperms, which includes many species that are endangered or threatened. Using cutting-edge computational algorithms, we measured the evolution of geometric (i.e. volume) and topological (i.e. holes) properties of gymnosperm hypervolumes across a comprehensive calibrated phylogeny. ResultsOur comparative analysis revealed weak evidence of the non-independent evolution of niche hypervolume volume and no evidence of the non-independent evolution of hypervolume holes. We also found that genera and families with low hypervolume volume such as monotypic groups like Gingko, likely experienced shifts in hypervolume evolutionary rates. Main conclusionsOur results show that geometric and topological properties of gymnosperm climatic niche hypervolumes evolve independently. This agrees with competitive exclusion hypothesis in ecological theory where extant groups are likely to be the ones which minimise niche overlap and competition.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
13.90
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.