Automatic segmentation of the rat brain hippocampus in MRI after traumatic brain injury
Riccardo De FeoiD, Elina HämäläineniD, Eppu MannineniD, Riikka J. ImmoneniD, Juan Miguel ValverdeiD, Xavier Ekolle Ndode‐EkaneiD, Olli H.J. GröhniD, Asla PitkäneniD, Jussi TohkaiD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWRegistration-based methods are commonly used in the anatomical segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. However, they are sensitive to the presence of deforming brain pathologies that may interfere with the alignment of the atlas image with the target image. Our goal was to develop an algorithm for automated segmentation of the normal and injured rat hippocampus. We implemented automated segmentation using a U-Net-like Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). of sham-operated experimental controls and rats with lateral-fluid-percussion induced traumatic brain injury (TBI) on MR images and trained ensembles of CNNs. Their performance was compared to three registration-based methods: single-atlas, multi-atlas based on majority voting and Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations (STEPS). Then, the automatic segmentations were quantitatively evaluated using six metrics: Dice score, Hausdorff distance, precision, recall, volume similarity and compactness using cross-validation. Our CNN and multi-atlas -based segmentations provided excellent results (Dice scores > 0.90) despite the presence of brain lesions, atrophy and ventricular enlargement. In contrast, the performance of singe-atlas registration was poor (Dice scores < 0.85). Unlike registration-based methods, which performed better in segmenting the contralateral than the ipsilateral hippocampus, our CNN-based method performed equally well bilaterally. Finally, we assessed the progression of hippocampal damage after TBI by applying our automated segmentation tool. Our data show that the presence of TBI, time after TBI, and whether the location of the hippocampus was ipsilateral or contralateral to the injury explained hippocampal volume (p = 0.029, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Testing a convolutional neural network-based hippocampal segmentation method in a stroke population
Artemis Zavaliangos‐Petropulu, Meral A. Tubi, … Sook‐Lei Liew·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2020
- Automated and manual segmentation of the hippocampus in human infants
Jared Fel, Cameron Thomas Ellis, Nicholas B. Turk‐Browne·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2023
- Automatization and validation of the hippocampal-to-ventricle ratio in a clinical sample
Sofia Fernandez‐Lozano, Vladimir Fonov, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2024
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases
Riccardo De Feo, Artem Shatillo, … Jussi Tohka·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2021
- A Deep Learning Framework for Biomarker Segmentation and Classification in Traumatic Brain Injury
Rohan Dash, Karthick Mayilsamy, … Subhra Mohapatra·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2026
- Non-Linear Realignment Improves Hippocampus Subfield Segmentation
Thomas B. Shaw, Steffen Bollmann, … Markus Barth·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2019