bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
The contribution of movement to social network structure and spreading dynamics under simple and complex transmission
Abstract
The structure of social networks fundamentally influences spreading dynamics. In general, the more contact between individuals, the more opportunity there is for the transmission of information or disease to take place. Yet, contact between individuals, and any resulting transmission events, are determined by a combination of spatial (where individuals choose to move) and social rules (who they choose to interact with or learn from). Here we examine the effect of the social-spatial interface on spreading dynamics using a simulation model. We quantify the relative effects of different movement rules (localized, semi-localized, nomadic, and resource-based movement) and social transmission rules (simple transmission, anti-conformity, proportional, conformity, and threshold rules) to both the structure of social networks and spread of a novel behaviour. Localized movement created weakly connected sparse networks, nomadic movement created weakly connected dense networks, and resource-based movement generated strongly connected modular networks. The resulting rate of spreading varied with different combinations of movement and transmission rules, but-- importantly--the relative rankings of transmission rules changed when running simulations on static versus dynamic representations of networks. Our results emphasize that individual-level social and spatial behaviours influence emergent network structure, and are of particular consequence for the spread of information under complex transmission rules.
- research focus: synaptic & neural circuits
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: simulation
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fragmented social networks promote complex behavioural contagions over infectious disease spread
Nitara Wijayatilake, Shweta Bansal, … Matthew J. Silk·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2026
- Social networks with strong spatial embedding generate non-standard epidemic dynamics driven by higher-order clustering
David Haw, Rachael Pung, … Steven Riley·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 8, 2020
- Social, spatial and temporal segregation in an ant society
Lauren E. Quevillon, Ephraim M. Hanks, … David P. Hughes·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2014
- Density-dependent network structuring within and across wild animal systems
Gregory F. Albery, Daniel J. Becker, … David M. Tickler·Nature Ecology & EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2025
- Group size and modularity interact to shape the spread of infection and information through animal societies
J. C. Evans, D. J. Hodgson, … M. J. Silk·bioRxiv·May 1, 2021
- Social fluidity mobilizes contagion in human and animal populations
E. Colman, V. Colizza, … S. Bansal·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2020